Point 5 and 7 are essentially the same thing. But it is the biggest problem imo. If that weren't the case I don't think anywhere near as many people would be against it.
We have lots of "foreign" doctors, nurses, IT people etc here. Why? Because we dont have enough of our own qualified in those areas. That is a fact so foreigners do important jobs. Theyre not all spongers. So, should they all be sent home and hope enough "locals" step up to the plate and fill the jobs. I have neighbours who have spent their entire lives on social despite being offered work. What are they? I just dont agree with this one size fits all bullshit based mainly on someones skin color, its little or no better than the Protestant Catholic debates
Leedssteve is stealing an immigrants job. For decades public transport in London was run by the wind rush West Indians....
That's all very well but for all those who are qualified as doctors, nurses, teachers etc there'll be another 100 that'll be a drain on resources. The UK is a tiny island already full to bursting, there's no more room. At the moment the few hundred thousand is just a trickle compared to the millions who'll descend on Europe if the borders are opened. Before you know it Europeans will be in a minority on their own continent
Only 7% of the UK could even realistically be described as inhabited. There are plenty of real reasons why unchecked immigration is bad but no room isn't one of them.....
So youre happy to have the immigrants that may be of some use to you Forza, like treating you in hospital?
I said for every qualified doctor, nurse, teacher etc there'll be another 100 who'll be a drain on resources, and I stand by that. It wasn't that difficult to understand was it?
Obviously it was if you don't see that Eire called your post entirely right.... You are happy enough to pick and choose which immigrants are acceptable.
Hope youre never ill and have to be looked after by a foreigner. i presume youll tell him to fook off home and you want to be treated by one of your own
But is most of that 93% that you call un-inhabited farm land ? Because as a country we can't feed our population and the time will come when other countries wont have the spare food to sell us.
Imagine the UK at civil war for a good and proper reason like toppling a government and British people heading back to fight and being witness to that amount of people landing in Calais as they did Greece from Kos. You would shoot every single young male on sight for deserting. Perhaps I'm stuck in a British WW2 mentality, but they are nothing but deserters, not refugees, not immigrants. That said, the EU states and those that caused these wars to unfold have not played their part. Troops on the ground are required, not ****ing sorties!
Only 33% of land suitable for arable farming in this country is currently used.... You would be looking at millions and millions of additional people coming before we couldn't feed ourselves. At the moment we choose to buy rather than grow. Iarnt going to worry about what happens in six or seven generations time... Anything could have happened by then.
You go abroad even in Europe and you fall ill or have an accident, the ****s will let you die unless you pay them there and then before they do anything, over here we send a plane for some injun whos been shot in the boatrace for being a gobby **** and give them free treatment
