1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

The Cricket Thread 2015-16

Discussion in 'Southampton' started by TheSecondStain, May 22, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. tomw24

    tomw24 Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    70,172
    Likes Received:
    39,134
    Glamorgan in trouble. That flew off a length and hit Adams in the head. Points deduction coming for them.
     
    #1021
  2. tomw24

    tomw24 Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    70,172
    Likes Received:
    39,134
    Umpires talking to Rudolph now.
     
    #1022
  3. tomw24

    tomw24 Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    70,172
    Likes Received:
    39,134
    Vince on his way out now.
     
    #1023
  4. st_brendy

    st_brendy Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    23,579
    Likes Received:
    11,860
    Unless there is the possibility within the laws to award us two win points retrospectively, which I'm not aware there is, then the umpires should let the game continue until 10 overs (assuming we are happy to do so), but possibly forcing Glamorgan not to bowl their seamers until then. And then call it off right on 10 overs.
     
    #1024
  5. tomw24

    tomw24 Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    70,172
    Likes Received:
    39,134
    If the game is abandoned now it's a no result and 1 point each.
     
    #1025
  6. tomw24

    tomw24 Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    70,172
    Likes Received:
    39,134
    Glamorgan will be in deep **** for this.
     
    #1026
  7. tomw24

    tomw24 Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    70,172
    Likes Received:
    39,134
    Match abandoned.
     
    #1027
  8. tomw24

    tomw24 Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    70,172
    Likes Received:
    39,134
    Glamorgan have to get more than 2 points deducted for this. The pitch is a joke.
     
    #1028
  9. st_brendy

    st_brendy Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    23,579
    Likes Received:
    11,860
    I'm not going to go and study the rules, but given this is two years in a row for them - and even worse, they couldn't even complete this match - then I wouldn't be surprised if the ECB have the power to penalise them more heavily.

    The stupid thing is that any penalty they get will almost certainly apply next season, not this season. So they remain very much in the frame for a top four finish.

    I only hope that the ECB find a way to award us two points, not one. But I can't see it. As I say, I'm not aware of a rule that allows them to.
     
    #1029
  10. st_brendy

    st_brendy Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    23,579
    Likes Received:
    11,860
    So Glamorgan refused to take Hogan off. Makes me hope that they throw the book at Glamorgan even more.
     
    #1030

  11. st_brendy

    st_brendy Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    23,579
    Likes Received:
    11,860
    Simon Walter from the Daily Echo is reporting that the ECB will announce tomorrow the points outcome.
     
    #1031
  12. fatletiss

    fatletiss Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    57,300
    Likes Received:
    40,066
    Any guesses on outcome?
     
    #1032
  13. tomw24

    tomw24 Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    70,172
    Likes Received:
    39,134
    Glamorgan will get a points deduction of some sort. I suspect Hants and Glamorgan will get 1 point each for a no result which is bullshit.
     
    #1033
  14. fatletiss

    fatletiss Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    57,300
    Likes Received:
    40,066
    That's pants
     
    #1034
  15. saintalfie

    saintalfie Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2014
    Messages:
    396
    Likes Received:
    224
    I agree it is, but it is pretty difficult for the ECB to do something outside of laid down competition rules, and No Result means 1 point each. Although we were in a good position to win that game, it was far from certain that we would have done so with so many overs left. Still tough on Hants not to have the chance to go for it though.
     
    #1035
  16. SAINTDON13

    SAINTDON13 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Messages:
    16,183
    Likes Received:
    2,499
    Essex won by 6 wickets.
     
    #1036
  17. st_brendy

    st_brendy Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    23,579
    Likes Received:
    11,860
    ECB announced that they've referred the matter to their disciplinary commission, and that the final outcome will be announced next week. Suggests to me that they're thinking of a harsher punishment for Glamorgan than just -2.

    Yet another stupid run out today. But at least the runs are coming, and we've finally dropped Gatting. Four spinners though, I hope it turns!
     
    #1037
  18. st_brendy

    st_brendy Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    23,579
    Likes Received:
    11,860
    So far, so good. Patel seems to be getting assistance from the surface. Obviously doesn't help us for the next 30+ overs, but good signs for when we come to bowl. Score of 250 might be defendable, even with the quick outfield.
     
    #1038
  19. st_brendy

    st_brendy Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    23,579
    Likes Received:
    11,860
    I confident that 280 that is a good score. But I'm not quite confident enough to say that I think it's a match winning score.

    Two 100 partnerships in two days from Dawson and Smith. Great, sensible pairing. The fact that we were picking Gatting ahead of Smith for the first few games was just laughable (as is the fact that we're still loaning Dawson out for t20, whilst picking Gatting).
     
    #1039
  20. tomw24

    tomw24 Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    70,172
    Likes Received:
    39,134
    We don't need Dawson for T20. We've got Smith, Briggs and Crane as spinners and Shah as batsman.
     
    #1040
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page