Well then how is it better? If the whole point of having a sponsor is to earn revenue then how is having one that pays less than the previous one a good thing?
Our kid has seen the new home shirt - he says it is a big improvement on recent years. He has given it 8.5 out of 10. Now for some new players
I don't usually do negative.. But I hate it.....Must have made the club next to nothing. I would have stuck DOVE HOUSE on the shirt and the positive publicity would have been huge. And more shirts would have been sold IMO. I'm not buying one but then I hate zoos. Animals shouldn't be in cages
I wonder if they're paying us or Pickering Town more? please log in to view this image It obviously makes you barely any money, seen as though Leeds have decided not to have one this season and I'd guess they'd get more than us.
Flamingo Land will deffo be happy if we become Hull Tigers tomorrow, marketing dream for the Club and the Park
Just Diame, Snodders and whatever 'striker' Brucey brings into the building. Most of the strikers he signs seem to fall over when striking the ball. Then again is it all part of the subterfuge to get 'Tigers' on the front of the shirts at some future date! Start with flamingos.......