Off Topic Dark Matter and other Astronomy information.

Sorry to jump in here but are you suggesting that protrusion in the bottom picture is the nose of a plane and not just debris/gases being ejected by the explosion?

I have already stated I wouldn't believe anything I saw on TV as I have seen enough Dinosaurs and spaceships to know anything can be created, has the bottom picture been officially described as the plane because if so, I call bullshit.

 

I wasted much of yesterday on this cack.. but if you look at the image again, look at the lighting on this "gas and debris" and the uniform shadow on it, and the shadow it casts on the building, it is clear it is not what you suggest. Whatever "it" is, it's not gas and debris.

 

Fixed

 

i know its "dark matter"

case closed.

move on.

 

I think you are right, look at the shape of this dark matter, it's identical!

please log in to view this image

#mysterysolved

 

you sure its not a sun spot though...

 

"Britain and Ireland will suffer a series of major damaging deluges and floods during the period 15th to 28th Sept 2008" these were forecast by WeatherAction using solar activity 7 months previously.

So if he can predict weather 7 months in advance, and be right and he can do this using solar activity. It shows the stupidity of that "funny" comment.

All the climate scientists and all the IPCC's men can't get it right for the previous years weather. Let alone 7 months ahead.

 

so was this a training exercise prior to 2011?

 

What does that even mean? You can be a bit of an arrogant condescending tit MITO unles I am misinterpreting your posts

 

ah c'mon i'm only having a bit of fun with you!

 

Apologies then mate. The way this thread's gone you can understand why I might think that
7 months predictions being right is no small feat in meteorology

 

that may have played a part in my wind up

 

you ****, I bit. Here fishy fishy

Sorry about the bitchiness mate

 

If he can predict the weather 7 months in advance why doesn't he?

Any gambler can hit lucky once, ignore their massive losses, then pretend they still have a "system"

 

You are right, I could guess and get it right in 7 months.

But he is not guessing Astro isn't that the whole point I am making here.

He followed that prediction up with predicting floods, and the record snows months ahead in 2010, which was contrary to the Met office and IPCC. He was right and he used science to make his predictions, you are implying he uses a magic 8ball, hardly accurate or a fair point mate.

if he was wrong, the BBC would definitely mention him, but seeing as he gets it right, he is whitewashed by the BBC. All scientists who have evidence the IPCC are wrong never get airtime

He's asked the UN for the scientific evidence that CO2 causes warming and still years later has recieved no reply, because there is no actual evidence.

 

Me agreeing with you is becoming a habit................

Getting one right in 2008 means jack **** in isolation.

 

He's not only got one right, he gets it right most of the time, while the IPCC consistently get it wrong. Proven fackts without a doubt

Again commenting on something without knowing anything about it Toby

 

He has a string of massive failures, which he wrote off as a "procedural error"

The BBC does not make a habit of listing by name every fraud who has made ****e predictions that week

Since when does the UN reply to individuals who turn up at their door demanding evidence?

 

Any evidence that his predictions are better than others.

 

Don't worry the season isn't far off now