Sorry mate wasn't having a go at you really, the price of attending matches really angers me that's all
That's the Tory way- screw the average person over and make the rich richer- I thought you liked that ideal kio. Ps- that's the last time I'll bring politics into a non politics threas
Can't say I noticed any difference when we had Bliar and Brown in power PS that's the last time I'll bring politics into a non politics thread
You're forgetting about what's called the Laffer curve. It's based around taxes the the same thing applies. The higher a price gets the more proe opt out so the revenue is lowered not increased by raising prices. Revenue streams are far more reliable if we added 10000 seats but dropped ticket prices.
Also saying that it would take us four years to pay off the expenditure is rather a short-term way of looking at things. Four years is no time at all in business terms, especially when we have a guarantee of at least four years of Premiership money (including parachute payments). It took Arsenal five years or so to pay off the cost of building the Emirates, and now they have they are one of the most financially secure football clubs on the planet
I will be disappointed if the Jerrold second tier is not started in the close season. In less than a year in other words. They must have all the plans and costs in place surely. Just a case of getting Carter's, our builders of preference, to organise the material supply and delivery. But do the demolish the City stand and start rebuilding at the same time? It makes sense that they do.
Take a look at KIO's thread about Mcnally and listen to the interview particularly the last minute and it makes this thread almost redundant Hera
"At some point we will look to hopefully put some extra seats in here (Carrow Rd) but that might take a while." So it's not happening anytime soon. Hera
I think we go back to the argument that the money is best invested in the football. At least for a while.
Something needs to be worked out, the City stand is a bit of joke for a main front facing stand you'd expect something a bit grander but I suppose it was adequate for when it was built. The problem is the road access and Koblenz 'Angry Car ****er' Avenue, if we could sort that one out I don't think it would be a problem, but in my opinion this is the stand which needs to be developed. Even though I slag off modern stadiums, I was immensely envious of Wembley, in the second tier area it was like standing in a really spacious airport lounge, still I would never leave Carrow Road though.
So the NDR has got the go ahead and you can bet your bottom dollar that there will now be a lot more housing developments because of this. The population of Norfolk is going to be even greater now with a lot more football fans, perhaps we are going to need a new 40k+ stadium after all
The effect of that will take many many years to even start. All those moving into the region will likely already have other football affiliations. The next generation could see a start of Canary fans being created.
I did have my tongue planted firmly in my cheek there GE ...just trying to get another reaction and the debate going again
I still think we should definitely be looking to redevelop rather than move. To ease congestion though we should look to another of the local features and have a park and row on the river. Boats could go east to a purpose built parking area near the A47 with it's own access. please log in to view this image Or for the more lazy we could go for motorised ones similar to the touring ships in Amsterdam or taxi's in Venice. Bah!