Off Topic Dark Matter and other Astronomy information.

Not our night, I'm afraid.

 

I don't know so I won't argue with you, I've already spent more time on the moon mission than I care to it's not something I have dabbled in really and the possibility my suspicious are unfounded is pretty darn huge

 

what, in space?
#wrongthread

 

Volume 4 PROGRESS IN PHYSICS October, 2013
SPECIAL REPORT
Forty Lines of Evidence for Condensed Matter — The Sun on Trial:
Liquid Metallic Hydrogen as a Solar Building Block
Dr Pierre Marie Robitaille (Same guy that busted WMAP lies and proved in the lab that Kirchhoff's law on thermal emissions is wrong)
http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2013/PP-35-16.PDF

Robitaille conceptualised and BUILT the world's first ultra high field clinical MRI system, and doubled the world record for nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.\

If you've had an MRI, you probably availed of his work's payoff.

 

One reason why Robitaille succeeds where others are failing is the othes still adhere to Kirchoff's law, now proven wrong, Kirchoff's law of thermal emission being central to popular theory of how the alleged gaseous sun formed.

 

Wow, what a #meltdown

50 pages of him describing the basic appearance of stuff and then adding at the end "this all suggests I am right" with no logic

You can't even prove his arguments wrong because he doesn't even bother to state any

 

He's the world's foremost expert in this area, he built a new much better MRI machine himself, I don't think he is prone to meltdowns Astro.

People like you said he would "fry people's brains" when he aspired to smash the imaging record. He proceeded to double the record.

In case you don't get it, all of our solar theory, and for the universe, comes from imaging.

I guess actually proving an accepted law of physics wrong, in the lab, peer reviewed and repeated by others, is not proof enough for some Ah sure, you still believe the planet is warming

FYI Suffering countless meltdowns does not make you an expert on them same as a long term psychiatric patient is not an expert on psychiatry

 

lol that's one of the worst attempts at an argument from authority I've ever seen

You even #fail at putting forward a fallacy

 

please log in to view this image

 

Yep.

 

please log in to view this image

 

Given the average global has not increased 1998, which was when El Nino 1997 tailed off. We had several hot el nino events in the 90s. This led to the famous hockeystick chart. That chart tho failed to show that the correlation between CO2 and temp was broken and along with it the claims that CO2 causes temperature rises.

It's true tho, global warming is now a religion and no amount of science facts will make the zealots ditch their climate bible. Even the scientific fact that earth was over 2000ppm CO2 during GLACIAL PERIODS!

Stupid science also shows the record ice gained since 2012, yes, the ice is increasing, stupid science what can it tell us that a c(lie)mate bible cant eh


Hottest year on record, 1935, hottest day on record summer of 1922
Keep that bible close

I mean, all the hullabaloo is about man made emissions only.. which amount to less than 5% of the total CO2 5% is a generous guesstimate, realistically we could be producting 2% or less of total CO2.

 

So every El Nino warms up the Earth a bit and then it never cools back down again to it's pre-El Nino state?

You've just proven El Ninos violate thermodynamics. Get Pierre Marie Robitaille on it

 

What your bird in a cage brain didn't comprehend is that the el nino period was used in the stats to show global warming and prove CO2 and temp correlation, from the 50s onwards, hence the use of the 90s in an epic lie that the the hottest year on record was in the 90s, but everyone knows it was 1935 and even the EPA still have that year as the hottest. So, global warming CO2 and all that and yet the hottest year was 80 years ago, 30 years before we started cranking up the CO2 dial.
#busted
#hardluckAstro
Do you understand now, I am fearing for your sanity mate, so hell bent on duelling with me that you abandon basic understanding.
@saintanton
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/02/...achauri-acknowledges-no-warming-for-17-years/
Dr. Rajendra Pachauri, the railroad engineer who for some reason chairs the IPCC’s climate “science” panel, has been compelled to admit there has been no global warming for 17 years.
So they cooked up cliamte change so that every severe weather event would mean "proof"and the global warming religion can proceed even though they changed the god they worshipped for another god.

So, there it is from the IPCC, BOOM and one might ask why a railroad engineer is chairing the IPCC climate science panel?

 

@saintanton @astroturfnaut

look at 1998 to 2007 But CO2 has only risen? Where is the temp increases? What does the c(lie)mate bible say? A wizard did it?

please log in to view this image

 

(Today is the official "Post Pictures from xkcd Day"...)

 

As I've said before, I'm no climatologist (or scientist of any sort) so I can't answer your questions. However there are plenty of them, ie almost all, out there who all have access to the same data and stubbornly come to the conclusion that it is happening. And I tend to trust the majority who work in the field more than a merry band of professional doubters who just want to gainsay anything- for whatever reason.
Casting doubt on evidence is not the same as knowing it to be false, and if there's even the slightest chance that we might be contributing to some adverse conditions that might be detrimental in the future, then we really would be lunatics to ignore it.

Besides, reducing our consumption of a finite source is surely just common sense, however you look at it?

 

please log in to view this image

Gerrards heat map from last Sunday

 

Haven't seen that before! That's classic!