John van Zweden

I hope the club will be sensible over this - I'd hate to see 25% of the club up for sale because we wanted to avoid upsetting Manchester United.

 

Can you give some more info Bob? I don't understand what you mean here?

 

Me neither, but that's not unusual.

 

I thought exactly the same as him about Van gaal and i bet others did to. I dont understand jinx on this....

 

Valley try this.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/louis-van-gaal-branded-arrogant-5218404

Have to be honest, don't like LVG and agree with the comments, Perhaps he should have kept them private though.

 

History between the two of them, rival cities etc.

 

he only stated what the world and his dog already knew

 

Dont see anything wrong with it

 

I agree bepp. Nothing wrong with stating the truth

Cheers Trunds

 

Sorry, thought everyone was a aware.

I'd back van Zweden to the hilt.

here's another link with more or less the same info as in the Mirror.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...tml?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490

 

I do think our directors should behave with a little more decorum but I agree with him. Van Gaal is an arrogant so and showed it again in his post match comments on Saturday.

 

Mrs M, It did make me laugh when LVG was going on about all the great chances they created and other than the goal all MotD could find was Van Persie hitting the side netting in the second half. For all their pressure Fabianski had one of his easiest days (crosses apart).

 

I think the MOTD guys said they didn't agree with him as well. I've said before he fits well with United imo.

 

Even Herrara's shot was going wide - (I spent ages rewinding and slowing down the footage to be sure) an Ashley Williams stud deflected it inside the post. So even the shot for their goal wasn't on target.

 

Nothing to be worried about it's a Dutch local thing, matter of fact I hardly think our board will lose any sleep over it, as for Huw he's made a few gaffs in his time, anyway he was only telling the truth, because Van Gaal refused to shake hands with Garry Monk, and stated the Swans did not deserve to win, and that the only reason for them to take three points on Saturday was due to "a deflection of a player that might have been offside". what a cheek, I'd say Van Zweden should plea provocation and Huw should give him a cigar at the next board meeting aye..............

 

I think Huw is talking for the press. He'll say this to the media to give them the correct reaction, but he probably text Van Zweden straight after saying "Nice one re the Van Gaal comments, butt!" I don't think we'll see any reshuffling in the board room or any shares up for sale.

 

Apologise to LVG (even if you don't mean it) and move on

 

What a crock he did shake hands with him and so did giggs. Why do people make this **** up

 

That article has 2.3 million likes

 

Before the game yes, but not after, according to a number of media outlets?