I play to win, not win friends Something Costa would and Suarez would agree with imo Some of us bullshit our way though and are desperate for validation, I prefer to let the end product speak for me. I was always a nightmare for managers but I am so good at what i do they deem me worth putting up with
Wow clutching at straws. . I don't condone biting but it caused no damage so its nothing? that is a defence in itself. A most unnatural football action which can only be deemed as pre meditated (that of which i bad challenge cannot) and you are making out as if its nothing. Just because his bite didn't cause any damage, doesn't mean it cannot have. Likewise, Costa only "lightly stepped" on Can, didn't cause him any damage so was nothing really. If he really wanted to hurt Can he would have stepped far harder, maybe jumped on him, made a proper stamp. You see you can twist things how you want. For the record, Costa is as scummy as Suarez and he deserves the ban he is getting
Well, it's there to read and one will see it as they wish. It's plain English, something you can't seem to grasp. You're a bit of a manic fellow god bless you, so I won't deny you your self delusion. You, sadly, live in a world where what ever you post is right and everyone agrees with you, even sadder you crave agreement and when you don't get it you hammer away until you get the last comment in because well, people just get tired of your bitterness. Stop laughing at everything you say, it's creepy. Also, if you think the bites were anything, in the context of violence, then you are a bigger windbag than I originally thought. But I reckon you're a proper windbag all the same. One of those behind your back not to your face types. #coward
ffs another person who can't understand the language he speaks. If a child bites someone, you can look at the bite and say it is nothing and still punish the child and condemn the bite. <This is common sense and basic logic, and it is beyond you Then again, I seen your heysel rants, you're a sick puppy Bobby.
haha, back to your usual MO, you've been made to look a complete mug, so you've gone on the offensive. Not arsed, carry on, if it makes you feel any better, maybe it'll be theraputic to get over your latest downing. "I've never defended the biting" "IMO the biting was nothing" In the following sentence, ****ing classic The worst part is that you're that ****ing dim you can't grasp the simple fact that by attempting to downplay the act itself to 'nothing' you're doing so by definition.
Have you ever read any Knut Hamsun? If not give him a go I reckon you'll love him, you argue like him.
I'd believe you if u came before n Must be the Nordics rubbin off on me Am out of reading material. Might check him out, though if he's too much like me I might hate his guts
I'll check it out, I buy books every other week. #fastreader Everytime I finish a book I end up reading Conn Iguulden Emperor series all over again, my fav books of all time, mainly because they are mostly history augmented with fiction to fill in the gaps
Let me know what you think. “Truth is neither ojectivity nor the balanced view; truth is a selfless subjectivity.” ― Knut Hamsun, Hunger
What did i write about Heysel? You're so stupid to realise that by playing down the bite saying it was nothing is defending it. That you're trying to liken a fully grown adult Suarez, to a child is defending him. Even your fellow buddies aren't coming to help you (astro might) because like your conspiracy theories your arguments don't stack up.
The lady doth protest too much. Though I could be confusing you with someone else, that is possible. We're you ever a chav mod? And I call you coward, that's my thing, get your own
