Skrtel Vs Costa

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Red Hadron Collider said:
[HASHTAG]#howtowinfriendsandinfluencepeople[/HASHTAG] <laugh>
Click to expand...

<laugh>

I play to win, not win friends <laugh> Something Costa would and Suarez would agree with imo<laugh>

Some of us bullshit our way though and are desperate for validation, I prefer to let the end product speak for me. I was always a nightmare for managers but I am so good at what i do they deem me worth putting up with
 
Sisu said:
Quotes added above
As I stated I never defended the biting or stamping ever. IMO the bites were nothing, they caused no damage and that's my opinion, I never defended him doing it and there is no attempted mitigation on my part blaming opponents for him choosing to bite. Almost all of it is from sheer amazement at the reaction and of course, a lot of posts without any context of the discussion they were part of.

You must be a **** manager mate, you are an idiot

Seriously, in plain English, without your point scoring banter nonsense. Are you ****ing thick?

Now unless you have any other imaginary defences of the bites? I have a lot of coding to be doing
Click to expand...

Wow clutching at straws. <laugh>. I don't condone biting but it caused no damage so its nothing? that is a defence in itself. A most unnatural football action which can only be deemed as pre meditated (that of which i bad challenge cannot) and you are making out as if its nothing. Just because his bite didn't cause any damage, doesn't mean it cannot have. Likewise, Costa only "lightly stepped" on Can, didn't cause him any damage so was nothing really. If he really wanted to hurt Can he would have stepped far harder, maybe jumped on him, made a proper stamp. You see you can twist things how you want.

For the record, Costa is as scummy as Suarez and he deserves the ban he is getting
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobes The Grinch
Sisu said:
Quotes added above
As I stated I never defended the biting or stamping ever. IMO the bites were nothing, they caused no damage and that's my opinion, I never defended him doing it and there is no attempted mitigation on my part blaming opponents for him choosing to bite. Almost all of it is from sheer amazement at the reaction and of course, a lot of posts without any context of the discussion they were part of.

You must be a **** manager mate, you are an idiot<laugh>

Seriously, in plain English, without your point scoring banter nonsense. Are you ****ing thick?

Now unless you have any other imaginary defences of the bites? I have a lot of coding to be doing
Click to expand...

hahahaha, you ****ing moron <laugh>
 
Tobes said:
hahahaha, you ****ing moron <laugh>
Click to expand...

Well, it's there to read and one will see it as they wish. It's plain English, something you can't seem to grasp.

You're a bit of a manic fellow god bless you, so I won't deny you your self delusion. You, sadly, live in a world where what ever you post is right and everyone agrees with you, even sadder you crave agreement and when you don't get it you hammer away until you get the last comment in because well, people just get tired of your bitterness.

Stop laughing at everything you say, it's creepy.

Also, if you think the bites were anything, in the context of violence, then you are a bigger windbag than I originally thought. But I reckon you're a proper windbag all the same. One of those behind your back not to your face types.

[HASHTAG]#coward[/HASHTAG]
 
BobbyD said:
Wow clutching at straws. <laugh>. I don't condone biting but it caused no damage so its nothing? that is a defence in itself. A most unnatural football action which can only be deemed as pre meditated (that of which i bad challenge cannot) and you are making out as if its nothing. Just because his bite didn't cause any damage, doesn't mean it cannot have. Likewise, Costa only "lightly stepped" on Can, didn't cause him any damage so was nothing really. If he really wanted to hurt Can he would have stepped far harder, maybe jumped on him, made a proper stamp. You see you can twist things how you want.

For the record, Costa is as scummy as Suarez and he deserves the ban he is getting
Click to expand...


ffs another person who can't understand the language he speaks.
If a child bites someone, you can look at the bite and say it is nothing and still punish the child and condemn the bite. <This is common sense and basic logic, and it is beyond you
Then again, I seen your heysel rants, you're a sick puppy Bobby.
 
Sisu said:
Well, it's there to read and one will see it as they wish. It's plain English, something you can't seem to grasp.

You're a bit of a manic fellow god bless you, so I won't deny you your self delusion. You, sadly, live in a world where what ever you post is right and everyone agrees with you, even sadder you crave agreement and when you don't get it you hammer away until you get the last comment in because well, people just get tired of your bitterness.

Stop laughing at everything you say, it's creepy.

Also, if you think the bites were anything, in the context of violence, then you are a bigger windbag than I originally thought. But I reckon you're a proper windbag all the same. One of those behind your back not to your face types.

[HASHTAG]#coward[/HASHTAG]
Click to expand...
haha, back to your usual MO, you've been made to look a complete mug, so you've gone on the offensive. Not arsed, carry on, if it makes you feel any better, maybe it'll be theraputic to get over your latest downing. <laugh>

"I've never defended the biting"

"IMO the biting was nothing"

In the following sentence, ****ing classic <laugh>

The worst part is that you're that ****ing dim you can't grasp the simple fact that by attempting to downplay the act itself to 'nothing' you're doing so by definition. <doh>
 
Tobes said:
haha, back to your usual MO, you've been made to look a complete mug, so you've gone on the offensive. Not arsed, carry on, if it makes you feel any better, maybe it'll be theraputic to get over your latest downing. <laugh>

"I've never defended the biting"

"IMO the biting was nothing"

In the following sentence, ****ing classic <laugh>

The worst part is that you're that ****ing dim you can't grasp the simple fact that by attempting to downplay the act itself to 'nothing' you're doing so by definition. <doh>
Click to expand...


I made the last post so I win

[HASHTAG]#PlayByTobesRules[/HASHTAG]

I forgot to laugh at my own comment though
 
luvgonzo said:
Have you ever read any Knut Hamsun? If not give him a go I reckon you'll love him, you argue like him. :biggrin:
Click to expand...

I'd believe you if u came before n <laugh>

Must be the Nordics rubbin off on me

Am out of reading material. Might check him out, though if he's too much like me I might hate his guts :D
 
luvgonzo said:
Try Hunger by him, great book and I just think you'll enjoy the author. :smile:
Click to expand...

I'll check it out, I buy books every other week.
[HASHTAG]#fastreader[/HASHTAG]

Everytime I finish a book I end up reading Conn Iguulden Emperor series all over again, my fav books of all time, mainly because they are mostly history augmented with fiction to fill in the gaps
 
Sisu said:
I'll check it out, I buy books every other week.
[HASHTAG]#fastreader[/HASHTAG]

Everytime I finish a book I end up reading Conn Iguulden Emperor series all over again, my fav books of all time, mainly because they are mostly history augmented with fiction to fill in the gaps
Click to expand...

Let me know what you think.

“Truth is neither ojectivity nor the balanced view; truth is a selfless subjectivity.”
― Knut Hamsun, Hunger
 
Sisu said:
ffs another person who can't understand the language he speaks.
If a child bites someone, you can look at the bite and say it is nothing and still punish the child and condemn the bite. <This is common sense and basic logic, and it is beyond you
Then again, I seen your heysel rants, you're a sick puppy Bobby.
Click to expand...

What did i write about Heysel?

You're so stupid to realise that by playing down the bite saying it was nothing is defending it. That you're trying to liken a fully grown adult Suarez, to a child is defending him. Even your fellow buddies aren't coming to help you (astro might) because like your conspiracy theories your arguments don't stack up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blueman
BobbyD said:
What did i write about Heysel?

You're so stupid to realise that by playing down the bite saying it was nothing is defending it. That you're trying to liken a fully grown adult Suarez, to a child is defending him. Even your fellow buddies aren't coming to help you (astro might) because like your conspiracy theories your arguments don't stack up.
Click to expand...
Nothing more to say to you after this post, you make my skin crawl.
 
Sisu said:
Show me where I compared the bites to anything Costa did.

I compared players, their antics vary. Both dive both play act both try rile opponents and both go over the line, trying to differentiate the actual acts of going over the line is an attempt to portray one as worse than the other.
Also re your nonsesne media type "sinking in teeth" crap, had Suarez sank those teeth into anything he's have taken a lump out of the opponent, yet not once did he actually break skin, and that shows a measure of control, do you at least understand that? Because if he had just lost it and savaged an opponent he's have left far more than a few indentations, Tyson on Hollyfield is an example of actual biting, what Suarez did is what kids do when they have a temper fit. He certainly as a set of choppers that could do a lot of damage if he so wished.
This is pretty much similar to costa, he could have really injured Can, as well as Skrtel with his face clawing but he had a measure of control and didn't go that far, yes you all find Suarez nibbles worse than stamping and many of you lie and say you'd rather a punch in the face (epic lie) than a few indentations on the skin. They are still in the same category of going over the line regardless of which we find more repulsive.

So you can say "muppet" all you wish but the contents of your PMs in my inbox show who the real muppet is, maybe I could put them in my sig, you snivelling little bitch.

Also you obviously ain't got the cognitive ability to understand the rest of my post you replied to and so, like any average brainless twat you jump on one tiny piece, twisted it and then replied to your own twisted version.
Click to expand...

Again, I have never PM'd anybody ever. You are a cowardly lying twat.
 
Blueman said:
Again, I have never PM'd anybody ever. You are a cowardly lying twat.
Click to expand...

<laugh>

The lady doth protest too much.

Though I could be confusing you with someone else, that is possible. We're you ever a chav mod?

And I call you coward, that's my thing, get your own :bandit:
 
Sisu said:
<laugh>

The lady doth protest too much.

Though I could be confusing you with someone else, that is possible. We're you ever a chav mod?

And I call you coward, that's my thing, get your own :bandit:
Click to expand...

Never a mod. You have confused me with someone else. An apology will do fine.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back