I thought it needed it's own thread as there's been a few comments about Kit and his lack of experience may be costing us. Then I read that we need another manager and so on!
What I liked about the Kit appointment was the fact he lives and breaths Fulham. I felt it was a thought out and logical appointment. He did well as caretaker, lifted spirits, gave the players belief and confidence and got some much needed wins under his belt. It felt right. He knew the players, particularly the younger ones and they have all pretty much done well, LVC has been exceptional.
Just for comparisons sake his win percentage since he took over, in the league, is 47%. The Wolves manager has a win percentage (taken from the same weekend of Kits first match, Blackburn) of 35%. The since departed Adams at Norwich is 41%. Norwich and Wolves are just outside the playoff places.
So, all in all, I don't think he's done that badly. Is he the right man for the job? Absolutely.
Should fans be getting on his back when results don't go his way? No. Even Derby have had some bad results, so have Forest who everyone thought were nailed on for promotion.
I've always said that promotion this season isn't important. Stability is the key for me. We've got a new owner, had a ridiculous manager merry go round over 18 months and had some pretty bad PR in terms of how the club handled everything. Couple this with MAF squeezing every last drop before selling and therefore pretty much guaranteeing demotion. So stability, calm, younger players progressing and getting the right vision in place to take us through the next 10-15 years are whats required.
Replacing Kit, whatever happens this season, would be a backward step, IMO.
What I liked about the Kit appointment was the fact he lives and breaths Fulham. I felt it was a thought out and logical appointment. He did well as caretaker, lifted spirits, gave the players belief and confidence and got some much needed wins under his belt. It felt right. He knew the players, particularly the younger ones and they have all pretty much done well, LVC has been exceptional.
Just for comparisons sake his win percentage since he took over, in the league, is 47%. The Wolves manager has a win percentage (taken from the same weekend of Kits first match, Blackburn) of 35%. The since departed Adams at Norwich is 41%. Norwich and Wolves are just outside the playoff places.
So, all in all, I don't think he's done that badly. Is he the right man for the job? Absolutely.
Should fans be getting on his back when results don't go his way? No. Even Derby have had some bad results, so have Forest who everyone thought were nailed on for promotion.
I've always said that promotion this season isn't important. Stability is the key for me. We've got a new owner, had a ridiculous manager merry go round over 18 months and had some pretty bad PR in terms of how the club handled everything. Couple this with MAF squeezing every last drop before selling and therefore pretty much guaranteeing demotion. So stability, calm, younger players progressing and getting the right vision in place to take us through the next 10-15 years are whats required.
Replacing Kit, whatever happens this season, would be a backward step, IMO.