EDIT. These rules are a part of the solution to recent site issues, so your support would be appreciated as it helps everyone. Intructions from the top... All nudity is to be removed from the publicly available boards with immediate effect. Yes including nipples. This excludes password protected areas. The site administration team have decided jointly that mods need to remove any porn / nudity posts and links from their boards. If there are a lot in one area, supermods can permanently delete whole threads (if requested). Failure to do so by mods will result in supermods doing so instead, if mods do not wish to carry out these duties, they need to resign and new mods will need to be appointed. Any members that decide they wish to break the new forum rules will be banned for a minimum of 72 hours, increasing with each ban. Members that decide they want to throw abuse in the direction of the administration team will also be removed. This as been implemented due to these issues causing untold work for the supermods and site problems with google resulting in banning from searches and advertising. This includes half dressed sexy images that don't actually show anything too. Please respect these new rules as they will be followed and adhered to!
Can the nudity ban not start after Christmas so at least we can enjoy Miff's usual Festive Calendar ? I look forward to the Tinsel and Titties posts.
Something needed to be done, you wouldn't believe the **** the supermods get from some posters, it's utterly disgraceful.
Stan, I've got an answer drafted, but I want to make sure my thinking is the same as the owners. By all means ask and challenge, but can I ask people not to post images to test the owners for the minute, as I don't think they'll have the time or patience for it as it brings other problems to their door from google. It's not a prude thing, it's affecting the ability to have a board as googles reaction affects the funding the site relies on to exist.
Makes sense, I assume there are a few minors using our forum. Not sure how you'd check ages on a sub forum but I do see the need. Presumably without Google income this site would be difficult to keep going. I always thought Mick and the supermods must have skin like rhinos
Regarding Stans nipples... Stan, it's part of a bigger issue, so there's a lot that in isolation could look silly, but it hasn't been done lightly and is causing a lot of board users problems. The main issue is google's software doesn't differentiate. If that picture's okay, what about flat chested women? That's why the bar has to be set quite high. At the moment, Mick seems to be up to his eyes sorting the board out. Once he has a bit more time, I'll ask for a password area and we can sort out what rules board users want and what's acceptable to the site owner. Minxy says If you wants to look at fit topless men you can do it elsewhere ..... & she can recommend some.
To be fair, we come on here every day not even thinking how the boards are paid for. So if it's having an effect on the income then fair play to the supermods. Agree with the password site though
I'm not keen on the password section as it could become even more cliquey than people consider it already. You know the sort of thing ... The No Frank Fingers Sub-forum.
I think the main aim of the password area is to stop the google spambots picking up the images they don't like. Apparently some youtube clips cause it to react, which is funny, as apparently youtube is owned and run by google!!
Correct decision. If you want to share porn, use a porn forum. There's some real backwards types on here too, trying to out-do each other in extremity. We don't need it.
Correct decision. If you want to share porn, use a porn forum. There's some real backwards types on here too, trying to out-do each other in extremity. We don't need it.
