Their logo is red and black... so clearly they are capable of changing it to fit the shirt as they've put it all in white for the home shirt and black. They want their brand to stand out, OK but I don't see why they couldn't have had the Bet in Blue or even Amber since Asians seem to hate Blue. If the red in their brand is so important why is it missing in the black kit?
Do you think we asked them to change the logo on those kits? I'm 99.99999% sure they decided it was better, not us, which is precisely what i was talking about. So what's your point? See above.
I've not read this thread so I don't know if its been said but the most disconcerting thing for me is Jake Livermore is an FKW!
Because I've worked in marketing and PR for 16 years. If you sponsor something as part of brand recognition, 99.99999% of the time you decide how your logo looks on it.
Yes, precisely. I don't know what part of I'm 99.99999% they decided how it would be used that you can't grasp. Companies with any decent brand development have different logos for different backgrounds. They then use these as appropriate. The red might have looked a little silly against the amber and indeed the black, for example. I feel like I'm explaining marketing to an infant. Oh, it's Blampers.
What are you talking about? I must be colour blind, that kit isnt black and amber. It really is like trying to reason with someone who has no concept of, well anything, but they still try and debate it.
Know the feeling.... What colour is our third strip? Oh, its blue and white. May I recommend you re-read this standard text? please log in to view this image An oldie but goldie......
I really cant be bothered with the dual colour on dual colour versus single colour background discussion when you clearly have no idea what you are talking about.