Very true and the fact that they're in the 'big city' makes them believe they're automatically superior. When you go in the sides at West Ham it's like being in Tokyo, more tourists in there than Madame Tussauds
They probably think they are all just melty face, lord sugar, trotter wheeler dealer types. Nothing like a bit of stereotyping.
I think a lot of WHU fans don't realise that he does'nt leave for free when his contract comes to a end and that we will get compensation because of his age
The knacker who's the editor in chief is probably being screamed at all day long, by his gran, to clean up his bedroom
Well said Billy, that's why I respect and like you, you are consistent and do not bulls**t anyone. Those that you have castigated deserve it and the colourful manner you use is entertaining.
People getting arsey with West Ham and trying to prove Sunderland are bigger. When they indubitably are not. Not saying the OP, just the thread in general.
You twisting words again? Only one person directly compares West Ham to Sunderland in terms of who's the biggest club and that was DAPARKERSAFC and he did it very respectfully.
Do you never tire of being wrong? The thread is about the relative cost of players, nothing to do with 'my dad's bigger than your's' ....... Instead of just posting your **** views you should try actually reading the thread, what people are saying, then posting your **** views Your post smacks of bitterness tbf.
Sunderland are bigger than West ham. history book says so & West ham biggest ever crowd was 42,000 & that says it all.