Bit rich from the guy that posted this.....in the same thread he is moaning in lol, you couldn't make it up, as I have said countless times of late, your a hypocrite. Always the victim aye Dai.
Now your talking nonsense Vetch! Not sure what your taking mate, but 'spitting blood' means venom, where as 'dancing on the rooftops' means someone is on top of the world, elated very happy, they may be figures of speech but they are not the same, for goodness sake calm down!......................
I've always thought you were off the scale, I bet you believe in UFO's, and I bet you've got every series of Star Trek, beam him up scotty!....................
If Laudrup was allowed to stay we would have put up more of a fight in the Cups and wouldn ' t have been relegated ... a very good opinion ! Anyone who doesn't realise that Laudrup had the rug pulled out from under him , with a healthy team ready for action , is only fooling himself .
what utter nonsense.. he failed to get the players motivated and that's why the majority were happy that jinxs sacked him...
I believe in UFO's because they're unidentified - here's a clue it's in the name And what pray tell is wrong with Star Trek???? HERETIC!
Did you not watch the tie against Napoli? We nearly pulled off one of the biggest upsets in European football history.
Hi good Jacks! Thought Iâd let you in on how the story went in the Danish papers (just widening the circle a wee bit). ML had a great first season with very good results and making the club a lot of money through superb buys. Everything was ready to take the club to the next level, which would have included taking some chances by investing in even better players. It would have been a gamble, but with good odds, Iâd say. The board wasnât ready to take that chance. Itâs quite understandable although chances like that are few and far between for a small club, but then why hire ML in the first place? So, ML lost motivation and would have left at the end of the season. According to his contract, ML was in for a multimillion bonus if the club stayed in PL. The board thought they could save the bonus money if they sacked ML before the end of the season, being pretty sure like everybody else that the place in PL was secured already. They were right about the second thing, but their excuse for sacking ML was a joke, of course, so they had to honor the contract and pay up, thus losing face for nothing. I come to think of the petty behavior of a certain ballboy, who took away, for me at least, the lustre of one of the most glorious moments in the history of the club. Same thing, really.
basically then laudrup was **** If laudrup had stayed with the swans philosophy like he signed a contract to do then there would have been no problem but he didn't and results got worst and the players were not happy and we were so close to getting relegated that our chairman had to step in.....He was not the manager we hoped he would be and not for us...ego to big and don't listen to criticism...he had to go to save our season.....He might be ok somewhere else but for us then no way...
And rightly so Vetch, your normally reasonable, but clearly you have mutated these last few weeks, maybe others couldn't be bothered!...................
The Club treated Laudrup shabbily,but had to pay the price eventually. Some who post here are STILL denigrating Laudrup. They are showing even less class than The Swans' Board, but regrettably they are not going to have to pay any price.
