1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Football League Statement

Discussion in 'Leeds United' started by 666 & Elmo, Apr 5, 2014.

  1. 666 & Elmo

    666 & Elmo New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,054
    Likes Received:
    324
    Football League - arses:

    An independent QC has overturned the decision by the Board of The Football League that Massimo Cellino is subject to a disqualifying condition under its Owners' and Directors' Test.

    A Football League spokesman said:

    "We are disappointed at the outcome of the appeal hearing, however we would like to thank the independent QC for his diligence in reviewing this decision.

    "This was never about individual personalities, but instead was a matter in which we were obliged to uphold the integrity of our regulations having considered the issue in detail with our advisors.

    "It was always an extremely complex matter in which a different interpretation of a judgment made under Italian law could lead to an entirely different outcome in the context of our regulations. Ultimately this has proven to be the case.

    "The independent QC has concluded that Mr. Cellino's recent conviction in the Sardinian Court did not involve conduct that would 'reasonably be considered to be dishonest' based on information available to him at the current time.

    "The Football League will now consider the findings of the hearing."
     
    #1
  2. LeedsinYork

    LeedsinYork Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    695
    Likes Received:
    307
    Set of ****ers, I doubt they can overturn it now though.
     
    #2
  3. Irishshako

    Irishshako Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2011
    Messages:
    44,508
    Likes Received:
    41,436
    **** the FL.......
     
    #3
  4. Chippy / Glory

    Chippy / Glory Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2012
    Messages:
    47,417
    Likes Received:
    12,662
    There is no further appeals in the fl process and rules. They could ask for judicial review but they would be liable for costs, and they would have to win the argument the QC they appointed made decision that was legally flawed. Never going to happen!

    They will tighten up the rules for the future, and probably put more than one appeal stage in place.... We won't care....
     
    #4
  5. TC (Lovely Geezer)

    TC (Lovely Geezer) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    16,467
    Likes Received:
    4,111
    The only small problem you have now is that if his appeal against the tax evasion case sticks, and by some miracle you get promoted from the Championship in 7 or 8 years time, he will not pass the f&p test for the Premiership, so promotion would not be possible unless he sells <ok>
     
    #5
  6. Chippy / Glory

    Chippy / Glory Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2012
    Messages:
    47,417
    Likes Received:
    12,662
    He would pass that on exactly the same basis as he passed this. Time to change the record.
     
    #6
  7. lifecheshirewhite

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    31,011
    Likes Received:
    20,975
    If we got promoted there would be no problem selling with the massive Premiership money that comes in.
     
    #7
  8. 666 & Elmo

    666 & Elmo New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,054
    Likes Received:
    324
    Full judgment here - http://www.football-league.co.uk/staticFiles/17/c1/0,,10794~180503,00.pdf

    The FL really tried to screw Cellino over and effectively demanded that the judge throw out evidence by other independents.

    He is deemd to be convicted, but he is not dishonest - it is the latter that has helped him.

    But the FL will be looking to screw us at any and every opportunity in the future

    "Ciao & Forza Leeds"
     
    #8
  9. Eireleeds1

    Eireleeds1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2011
    Messages:
    31,452
    Likes Received:
    32,168
    Let them try elmo. Don't think they'll be terrible anxious to take on our massimo
     
    #9
  10. 666 & Elmo

    666 & Elmo New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,054
    Likes Received:
    324
    Incorrect - the QC's decision is that he is "not dishonest" which is required under the test
     
    #10

  11. Jugster

    Jugster Active Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2011
    Messages:
    219
    Likes Received:
    60
    I laughed when I read that the FL were disappointed. Why would you be disappointed if it was an unbiased, motive-free judgement? You would be thankful that a legal expert put you on the right track and you avoided being sued. But then of course, the FL WERE disappointed because they WERE biased and all the members had an interest in keeping Leeds in the FL. Well **** you FL, the farcical excuse of not paying import duty on a yacht has been shown to be a flimsy piece of connivance. And as for the Premiership - if they can let Abramovich in, who committed corporate fraud, bribery and theft in his dealings with and the accumulation of shares in Sibneft, then they will let anyone in.
     
    #11

Share This Page