I fail to see how you can claim it as fact. Even if you had spoken to AA himself, are people always truly honest about their exact and real motives? Even AA would surely ascertain that admitting this was the real reason for the name change would portray him to be even more ridiculous than he is already perceived to be. The man is perfidious and cannot be trusted. But, back to our topic, for you to state that itâs a fact is way off the mark unless you have something truly conclusive, something that probably doesnât exist. Itâd been fair to say something like: â I believe this to be trueâ but call it fact is plain wrong. The noun âfactâ is misused today; especially by acolytes and paid up members of generation LOL.
The Circle, Anlaby Rd. You might have heard of it, its where the team that only exists thanks to the generosity and brilliant business acumen of our owner plays.
I've yet to see a single CTWD member answer any valid point made against their mafia. Not one single valid point. Just childish comeback and insults. Supposedly because they don't have time to answer a point they believe to be bollocks. Zero progress. Zero debate. Best way to stay in the past. Silver lining is that they're proving nothing productive will get done with their input so I'm not too worried. Let them play Alan Sugar all they want and piss 20k on leaflets and scarves if they want to.
Do f*** off, please. Every time the witless points and questions made by people like you/Happy/patty are answered, you all just forget (conveniently?) that you've been answered and continue to peddle your blind arse-licking doggerel. Get a life and get some brains, if it's not too late.
Happy wrote a whole f**king page with points and 9 pages later there isn't one single answer to any point. So no maybe you can f**k off you biased turd. Why is it that YOU can question the Allams motives and honesty in every single ****ing shape or form but you can't even have a look at your own little boyscout club to see if they're following suit with their preaching.
You might need an adult to help you understand this. Allam marine is successful, and self sustaining. Down to the business acumen of the owner. Hull City AFC is not self sustaining, and the owner wants us to enjoy our current success, and wait for it, this might cause your brain to hurt, enjoy more success in the future, in a sustainable and profitable manner. So no, he has no need to change the thing he owns that is long term successful, but he has a need to change the other thing he owns that isn't. Hope that puts that to bed for you. Notice how I do you the courtesy of responding properly to your juvenile comments, yet you can't do the same to me Reg. Let go of the anger, it will just burn you up.
Clearly the Allan's £40million has bribed you and they've successfully made you believe they are great people. I never believed this statement of "giving back to the city that made me rich"... the allams aren't stupid. If they were merely giving back and being generous they would go back to their other projects and leave the club alone to people who know football. Clearly that's not the case and I don't think it's healthy to have one person, especially someone with so little knowledge of football, being in charge and controlling so many operations on so many levels at the club. one day we will see their true colours and believe me ,I really would rather eat some nice pie than for my scepticism to be proven right. They got their pride and ego involved and showed what kind of people they are. Don't give me this "they care and are passionate, they have to be to put in so much money in the club THey need to go, get rid of the cancer asap even if it means struggling next year It means that on a whim, (let's not forget why NB was sacked, he was sacked for expressing his opinion) the Allams could destroy our club or create some real problems off the field (that will surely reverberate on the field) I honestly don't know if I want such knee-jerk reacting, football noobies deciding our future. Philantropists don't usually deal in negative actions. Yet besides injecting cash the Allams have only dealt in negativity Talking of not responding when it suits I noticed your lack of response to this from the other night? Funnily enough you were full of insults & threats just beforehand but chose to ignore the real issue. "What makes you a **** is your current view being that people are out of order when being critical of our owner for proposing to change the name we've held for 110 years, yet you yourself were embarrassingly venomous towards him when he sacked a manager. What's changed between then & now apart from the Premier League? Now, which games have you noticed the lack of "Tigers" songs & where were you sat in relation to the City supporters?" You **** xx
Because it's bullshit that's been answered hundreds of times. As I keep saying, you of all people are in no position to lecture others about reasonable debate.
