That really couldn't be more ironic. You're always posting total nonsense and then when challenged, crying out things like "HahahahahahHAHAHhHAHA you're obssed with me quite pathetic really"
Thanks for proving my point by editing out my question and ignoring it Also, considering you have nothing better to do than pop out and say the same thing over and over on completely irrelevant topics, I can only conclude that you are indeed obsessed with me.
What Happy fails to see when he accuses us of censorship and bias is what does actually get deleted (tbf it's hardly his fault he can't see deleted posts). For a forum that's allegedly moderated in a way that favours CTWD, it might be worth me pointing out now that there are posters on here that if they were anti-name change would have been banned by now under either forum rules or site rules for posting in the manner they have over the course of this season, but have been allowed to remain in order to keep some balance. I'm not going to name names, because in most cases I've had the posts away almost immediately after they've been posted so the intended result has been reduced to nothing more than them being a persistent nuisance/spamming, but to be clear I don't mean Happy so that shouldn't be taken as some thinly veiled threat. It's perfectly even handed to say CTWD members on here can have a space for their members to discuss an event which only relates to them without having people disrupting it with accusations about the group that have been done to death on other threads. I'm saying that Steve Atkinson or who ever it is that's responsible for the YestoHullTigers campaign will be afforded the same facility if they want one for their members and it will be kept free from anti-name changers disrupting it. If the Yes side choose not to take us up on that it's hardly our fault.
I keep pointing it out because it's true! You tried to accuse CTWD of failing to complete an argument properly yet you're the worst for it. When someone challenges your unsubstantiated crap you go into 13-year-old girl mode and block all attempts to use reason. You asked Stan a question, it was **** all to do with me. I didn't even really get what you were asking.
So because you haven't banned some CTWD members who you should have for posts they shouldn't have made, you're claiming to be even handed? Ric, seriously, you should apply for the CTWD press officer job. This is not a CTWD forum, they should not have special little threads that only approved members of their snarky campaign can post in. If they want a private place, the internets a big place, they have a domain, they should use that. I should be allowed to challenge and debate any wrong doing I see on this forum and I should be allowed to challenge any lies or twisting of the truth I see.
When's your debate going to start? The people all for the change haven't offered any answers yet. You've had year and you've offered nothing. A bit like Mr Allam.
You think Dr Allam has offered the club nothing? I responded initially to the OP with my views and some opinions. I then responded to a suggestion from Ricardo that we should have a special safe place for idiots like you to post your lies and crap unopposed. You have added exactly...nothing. Well done.
Nor did I, PLT. Nor did I. I assume that anal's 'important decisions' (quoted from CTWD's Notice of Meeting) will be debated by those present. Folks like Happy, patty, anal, etc. won't be there, as they aren't members, so they'll no doubt scream "conspiracy" whatever results from the General Meeting.
No read it again. When will you & Mr Allam offer an argument FOR the name change. That's what i said. Whether he's not given anything to the club isn't the debate we're having.
You've got it the wrong way round dipshit. I think it's fairly obvious to everyone that you've been able to challenge anything you like, you continue to do so, despite looking ever more desperate to find something that isn't there.
Try reading it again: For a forum that's allegedly moderated in a way that favours CTWD, it might be worth me pointing out now that there are posters on here that if they were anti-name change would have been banned by now under either forum rules or site rules for posting in the manner they have over the course of this season, but have been allowed to remain in order to keep some balance. Could it be that Ric means 'if'?
Do you read the exact opposite into everything someone says? It's not CTWD members I haven't banned when we could quite easily have justified it. It's people who are anti-CTWD/pro name change that have acted like absolute bell ends and not been banned. Also, I'm not claiming that all the moderation has been even handed. You claimed it had been to suit CTWD, my claim is that in general when you have access to all the posts that are made and not just the ones that are still on the board it actually works the opposite way. I try to avoid things wrongly being claimed to be that way because we had enough bullshit from that Mackem about why we ban people without it creeping into this side of things. You're being this full of it about the moderation whilst they're still here, so god knows what level of bias we'd be being accused of if I wasn't giving Yes/DC posters more leeway than I probably should. The even handed claim is specifically in relation to providing both sides of the debate with a thread for them to get their members/supporters to provide input for themselves without the repetition of baseless arguments that have been done to death on the other threads disrupting them. If there's an issue to someone as a non-member of the group comes up in one of those threads then the place to deal with it would be either on one of the many threads they've been discussed previously, or on a new thread. If you can explain how that suggestion is unfair to one side or the other I'd be interested to know what I've missed.
You keep accusing people of lies without actually backing it up with any specifics or reasoning. I don't know what you hope to achieve with this. It's just standard Internet forum crap that you see on other forums and which is largely absent on here. Your constant vague accusations are incredibly tiresome. Be a man, if you're calling someone a liar at least be clear who it is and why.
