I seem to remember when we put Sunderland to the sword at their place the home stands looked half empty. I have never seen that at City. Also I doubt if most clubs have the free for all that is Walton Street to contend with.
I like the way he kept leaving dots at the end of his tweets back to me as though he thought what he'd said was leading to an awkward silence from me before an apology. Alright I misread something AshLord had put the other day about the blank forms (and quickly corrected/apologised for the mistake when it was pointed out), but if I was going to be being clever with the dots with someone I'd at least make sure I was right before I did.
I noticed another quirk to what Ehab was saying about the USP element. Apparently we need to drop the City because it's too common and doesn't give us something unique, then we'll be able to outperform Aston Villa and West Bromwich Albion because we don't want to be like them. Don't they have unique names?
He claimed he didn't write that Yes To Hull Tigers blog last week, but the dozy bastard saved it tagged 'written by Gerard Toplass'.
Have you seen Brighton's recent results? They seem like they're very selflessly doing everything they can to support the No campaign by avoiding getting promotion so that WBA continue to undermine the idea that having a unique name in the PL lets you do better than common names do.
