1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

No retro ban for Yaya?

Discussion in 'Chelsea' started by StanDMan, Feb 9, 2014.

  1. StanDMan

    StanDMan Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    7,567
    Likes Received:
    646
    No news anywhere about Yaya's little indiscretion.

    He obviously kicked at Wolfskinkel behind refs back.

    City is the new United!

    Edit: Found a piece in mail.


    Yaya caught by Mail
     
    #1
  2. luckywerthers

    luckywerthers Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    1,221
    Likes Received:
    20
    maybe because norwich have not complained? or as you say more likely because the press haven't !!
     
    #2
  3. Bullet tooth Tony

    Bullet tooth Tony Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    3,876
    Likes Received:
    1,005
    It's on SSN. "The FA may take retrospective action".
     
    #3
  4. luckywerthers

    luckywerthers Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    1,221
    Likes Received:
    20
    be well handy if he gets a ban
     
    #4
  5. StanDMan

    StanDMan Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    7,567
    Likes Received:
    646

    DeMichelis and Javi Garcia for City then
     
    #5
  6. GazFormidable

    GazFormidable Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2012
    Messages:
    633
    Likes Received:
    39
    Yaya Toure will not be charged by FA for weekend altercation with Ricky Van Wolfswinkel. Craig Bellamy got charged for violent conduct against Swansea though.
     
    #6

  7. fevriul

    fevriul Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2011
    Messages:
    1,111
    Likes Received:
    91
    Wow kicking a man on the ground while the ball is no where near.. not violent conduct..west ham must be ****ing livid!
     
    #7
  8. District Line

    District Line Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    13,366
    Likes Received:
    968
    Not worth a ban for me but as if a City supporting FA chairman was going to ban City's best player.
     
    #8
  9. JCC87

    JCC87 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2011
    Messages:
    916
    Likes Received:
    20
    If Matic or Luiz had done it they would be banned
     
    #9
  10. luckywerthers

    luckywerthers Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    1,221
    Likes Received:
    20
    is that true? city supporter bit
     
    #10
  11. Yurilly

    Yurilly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    86
    It just means that Matic will have someone to put in his pocket again for the FA Cup tie.
     
    #11
  12. angelordevil

    angelordevil Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2012
    Messages:
    859
    Likes Received:
    18
    #12
  13. Drogs

    Drogs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Messages:
    17,870
    Likes Received:
    356
    Neither this nor Carroll's are worthy of banning. Football is becoming ridiculous.
     
    #13
  14. Paulpowersleftfoot

    Paulpowersleftfoot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    4,461
    Likes Received:
    2,777
    Greg Dyke is a man utd fan
    Don't let that spoil your theory though
     
    #14
  15. Chelsea Pensioner

    Chelsea Pensioner Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    6,370
    Likes Received:
    1,381
    If the FA is consistent in one thing it is being inconsistent.
     
    #15

Share This Page