Although the official line is that Savile and Charles met in the 1970s as part of the coincidence of mutual charity work, Savile himself has stated that he was friends with the Royal family “for a million years.” In fact, it was reported that Savile actually stated he was introduced to the Royals in 1966 by Lord Mountbatten, a known ****phile and sexual pervert. Also Prince Philip as a ****phile it has been claimed, why would someone just make this up btw. In reference to how he became introduced and ingratiated with the Royal family, Savile stated, "Coming from Lord Louis, who was the favourite uncle of Prince Philip, that was quite something. So obviously I hooked up with the Prince – what was good enough for Lord Louis was good enough for him." So, already, we have Savile, a notorious ****phile linked to other individuals of the Royal Family named as ****philes as well. Prince Philip, of course, is Prince Charles’ father. Lord Mountbatten is largely considered Charles’ mentor. Savile was indeed close to British Royals as well as other elites for many years. It seems his qualification for such high connections were mainly due to his ability to obtain children for the twisted appetites of those considered beyond reproach for the mainstream media and, unfortunately, the general public. Savile quote again “The thing about me is I get things done and I work deep cover.” Essentially, it is clear that Jimmy Savile was a procurer of children not only for himself but also for wealthy ****philes all across the world, particularly in Britain. Even Savile’s own nephew has recently gone public with information tying Savile to a network of ****philes and sick sexual parties where children were repeatedly raped. Guy Marsden, Savile’s nephew, also stated that the parties were attended by household names in show business. It is worth noting that Savile and Prince Charles are open “supporters” of the same charities. Apparently, Prince Charles and the ****phile did have some similar tastes, some of which were even reported by the mainstream media. In 1999, after the Prince accepted Savile’s invitation to a private meal at Savile’s home in Glencoe, Scotland, Savile had arranged for three women to parade around dressed in pinafores, a type of dress without sleeves and an open back that is often worn over other dresses. Interestingly enough, pinafores were often worn by children. After the dinner, Charles wrote Savile a Christmas Card with a note that read, “Jimmy, with affectionate greetings from Charles. Give my love to your ladies in Scotland.” Of course, the mainstream is certain that Charles is referring to the local women brought in for the Royal entertainment. However, unless the hired help made an exceptional impression upon the mind of Charles, one must wonder whether or not these particular ladies are the “ladies” to which Charles is referring in his Christmas note. After all, Savile’s Scottish cottage was also the scene of much child abuse as well. Charles sent Savile a box of cigars and a pair of gold cufflinks on his 80th birthday along with another note that cryptically read, “Nobody will ever know what you have done for this country Jimmy. This is to go some way in thanking you for that. The global ****phile rings are generally made up of some of the most elite individuals the world over. This is particularly relevant when it comes to any questions regarding the behavior of the Royal Prince. At any moment when there is a chance that information might be leaked that would be damaging to the reputation of genetic royalty, the documents are sealed, the whistleblowers are dealt with, and the controversy covered up. - Queue Andrea Davison being hounded and chased off. There is speculation that Princess Diana sealed her own fate after threatening to reveal networks of ****philia within the Royal family. Indeed, Diana did speak of “dark forces” and members of an “organization” that were monitoring her shortly before her death. For instance, when it appeared that the so-called Black Spider Memos, a series of letters written by Charles to government ministers, would damage the perception of Charles’ impartiality if he were to become king, then memos were immediately blocked by the British government. Indeed, it would be extremely interesting to see the contents of the letters, since, in reality, the impartiality of the king is truly irrelevant in the grand scheme of British society and government. What is particularly interesting is that the letters are being blocked from release now, as the biggest ****philia scandal in British history is unfolding - specifically, at a time when one of the main focal points of the scandal, Jimmy Savile, was a close friend of the Prince. Even more so, it comes at a time when British government officials are also being implicated in ****philia networks. For those who may still be under the impression that ****philia is a crime beyond the capabilities of British politicians, take a look at this partial compilation of British politicians convicted of ****philia in recent years. http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix....t_of_Convicted_British_Paedo_Politicians.html But, while the connections between Prince Charles and the ****phile Jimmy Savile are themselves enough to make one wonder, the fact is that Savile is not the only relationship with a potential ****phile that Charles has maintained. Right Reverend Peter Ball is the most senior member of the Church of England another of Charles **** buddies ho was arrested. A quote from Ball “He (Prince Charles) has been wonderfully kind and allowed me to have a duchy house. The prince is a loyal friend. I have immense admiration for him, he has been through horrific times and is a great person.” Are we to believe the Prince is the absolute worst judge of character who ever lived. What is also very interesting regarding the people named in these child sex scandals and the scope of the scandals themselves, is that the individuals who have been trying their best to bring this information to light have been ignored and derided for years on end. This has been the case whether the individuals were whistleblowers, researchers, or even victims themselves. William Hague, needs to be questioned on why that Welsh inquiry into the massive ****philia in Welsh children’s homes was given the brief that it did and therefore stopped these kids from talking about what happened to them. And this is the big thing. Savile was an aging sleazy disc jockey and he had complete access to the British Royal family. Wtf?
I think it's the American version of the *****philia of Good Old Blighty. Anyone see the Brass Eye *****phile special? *****geddon!! Chris Morris is a genius.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/453381/Female-MP-abused-boy-in-care FORMER female MP was involved in a *****phile network at the heart of government, police have been told. UK gov, royals and elite businesses choc full of *****philes
Sisu, I take it you realise the ITCCS has no legal basis and is just a group of people who have got together because they believe the church, monarchies and any other organisation with power is comprised solely of peadophiles. The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (or ITCCS) is a one-man blog that pretends to be a tribunal established to enforce common law. Despite claims of being based in Brussels, the whole thing is written in Canada by Kevin D. Annett, a defrocked United Church of Canada priest. Its basically one bloke who runs a blog and likes to pretend the ITCCS is some legal entity with worldwide powers. Things like this are what give the internet a bad name and by this man's wild accusations being repeated as fact people may well miss real abuse against children.
Yep the queen likes to take large groups of children into the woods to murder them. Obviously. Some of the stuff your posting is pretty funny, not haha its about *****philes, but haha what a load of nonsense. I'm sure there are plenty of examples of people within positions of power abusing that power for all kinds of reasons, one of which is the abuse of children. That doesn't mean everyone who is in any position of power is corrupt and part of a global conspiracy to abuse children. Sometimes your assumptions seem totally exagerated, for example the idea that it's odd for Prince Charles to be on friendly terms with the head of the church - that seems one of the most obvious likely friendships to occur i could imagine. The future head of a christian country knowing the head of christianity within that country. Hardly a remarkable idea. And that hardly makes him a poor judge of character who likes to surround himself with *****'s. I'd imagine the majority of people who know someone who then comes out or is outed as a ***** have no idea. I don't imagine it's something they are particularly open about with their friends and family, surely?
afcftw, Sorry I meant to like your post , but being the fat fingered idiot I am I pressed the wrong symbol
I don't know about this ***** conspiracy but I don't need any conspiracy theories to tell me David Cameron is a c***
Most polititions are ****s tbh It goes slightly further to accuse them of knowingly covering up sexual abuse towards children though...
And its naive to accept it has never happened just because it was a politition or celebrity, look at what Savile did and consider that it was brushed under the carpet for decades because those that knew wanted promotion(including polititions and police) or thought he was to powerful to make an accusation about him. If it has/did happen those protecting *****'s are as guilty as them and should face serious jail time just like *****.
If you read my comment a couple of comments up you'll see i accept that there have been people in positions of power who abuse that power. And it's definately not beyond the realms of possibility that a politition or celebrity would cover up or commit such crimes and anyone found hiding these crimes should be punished. But half arsed conspiracy theories that make such strong accusations doesn't benefit anyone and if done in a way that can effect that persons reputation then it's a disgrace.
You're talking to someone that's been accused of being a murderer since 1985 due to the fact that ALL Liverpool supporters are guilty of killing 35 Juventus supporters and since 1989 been accused of being responsible for the deaths of 96 supporters of the club I support even if I was there or not, surely you've heard or read the stories that back me up, that's a disgrace more so than Sisu's links due to the length of time and the scale of the lies, so you see that's why I firmly believe its possible for those in authority to be capable of anything due to them playing a major part in those accusations and lies that we Liverpool supporters have wrongly faced for decades.
I think your going slightly OTT to suggest you've been accused of being a murderer since 1985. Maybe within certain places there is a level of blame attributed to Liverpool fans for certain events where deaths have occured. (And i do understand the widespread acceptance of that blame). But that's a little different to being individually named and accused of covering up or taking part in sexual abuse of children. Collective responsibility vs a named individual. If since 1985 you had individually been named and accused of horrendous crimes which put you in a position where your reputation, job, and future was threatened due to the nature of the allegations regardless of if you are ever charged, then i'd say it was a relevant example to use. But it's a totally different situation and has very loose parrallels. I'm not in anyway belittleing the events you have mentioned, want to make it very clear that i'm not suggesting those events don't have meaning or that there was not a very obvious cover-up re 89. Just that i think your being a little misleading when you compare those situations with an individual being accused of sex crimes against children with no proof, with the clear intention of trying to damage his reputation. Whilst i agree with your premis that the Hillsborough cover-up shows that it is very possible for people within power to be involved in real conspiracy theories (and there are loads of other examples as well), that doesn't in any way prove that Sisu's random links have any truth whatsoever to them or that they are ok (something being possible doesn't make it guaranteed or even probable) and it doesn't justify making wild accusations against those in power without any evidence to support the accusations. So whilst i am totally in agreement about people within power being involved in cover-ups and consipracies previously (and probably currently) i don't think that givespeople the right to attack an individual without evidence.
So.. the Vatican until recently had an age of consent of 12 years old. A city full of celibates had an age of consent of 12 for the last god knows how long. Seriously, the catholic church is an international *****phile ring folks. There is plenty of witness testimony, most disturbing is that dutch lady who testified about being shipped around the freaking world to powerful *****s. Shocking stuff. Unlike many others she lived. Children have been a vice for the mega wealthy and powerful for centuries. People think these powerful people deny their sick appetites for the sake of decency? You think these people are guided by the same moral compass we are? f**k no. People just can't fathom the Royals would do anything wrong. Jimmy Savile was not even the tip of the iceberg. I also suspect that you might be hearing stuff about a certain pop star, a Mr C Richard in the not so distant future possibly. Savile was supplying access to kids for decades, the network must be huge yet we have yet to see a substantial amount of arrests. Anyone trying to look too closely into this gets targeted by the government. What makes me laugh is you limeys think the government run the UK The Royal family still call the shots folks, make no mistake. Politics are a farce. Charles was up to his bollocks in this with Savile, now we know what he was up to his balls in, suffering of children!! the inbred Motherf**ker! The UN are even getting involved now. Vatican told to get rid of the *****s pronto. Problem is they are all *****s. Otherwise we'd have had someone come forward by now.
Sisu's conspiracy theories are a prime example of the timecube law, as below "As the length of a webpage grows linearly, the likelihood of the author being a lunatic increases exponentially."
My conspiracies? I wonder if I created a thread 10 years ago about Savile and the BBC coverup would you have called it a conspiracy and laughed? There are loads of victims that are being ignored lad, this is not someone putting together some vague disconnected documents and ideas as per bog standard conspiracy theory. It is based on people's accounts of a gruesome childhood in the hands of the state and the exploitation of them sexually by a ***** network that funnily enough had extremely close connections with the Royal family, we know *****s operate in rings, so it's funny that most associates of Savile should be "clear" of suspicion just because we don't want to believe otherwise. Seriously, it's attitudes like this that stop many victims coming forward. http://www.fromthetrenchesworldrepo...and-where-underage-sex-slaves-were-held/81521 Of course Bill was just friendly with this *****phile, just like Charles was "friendly" with Savile. The age of consent in the Vatican was 12 till last year? They had a gang of rent boys holed up in there too, all facts btw, not conspiracy. ****ing 13 year old boys in the Vatican, wow. A nest of ****ing *****s coincidence of course, 2 very high profile global figures connected to ***** rings. Charles and Bill. Of course they had nothing to do with it, I mean, we should just assume that right?
Epstein is a convicted *****, this is a fact. He was convicted using something called "evidence" in a court of law. If there is any evidence that Clinton, Prince Charles, Cliff Richard, etc have been involved in such matters they should be prosecuted. They should not be "convicted by internet" on the basis that some troll decides to accuse them and then this becomes "fact" purely because it is repeated so often. As I have said before my main concern with all these, as yet, unfounded allegations is that resources may be diverted investigating rumours created on the internet allowing the real perpetrators to go free, some of these real perpetrators may well be well known individuals. I've never been a believer of the theory that there is a secret group controlling the world, although I do believe that rich, like minded individuals, can get together on occasion to try to influence matters for their own ends, sometimes this is for good (Bill Gates and friends financing a vaccination programme) or for evil.
