And how does this ****er know that they do or don't get on? Did he interview Sturridge and ask him whether or not he thought Suarez was a ****? Did he **** Pure conjecture.
Not quite sure why you've quoted me there. Was you assuming I thought the article was correct in that SAS didn't get on because I provided a second example? For the record, the article is bullshit
Suarez and Sturridge have the mentality of real champions, and that shows when at 4nil they can both get so pissed off with missed chances and errors, either on their part or on the other's part. It clearly hasn't affected their on-field performances or linkups, they are phenomenal together. Such a bog roll rag "article"
if that was rooney we would have to put up with the bollocks in the media of it shows passion and grit. as its us its the complete ****ing opposite, ****s! not that i take any notice of the bollocks written in papers, just laughable that people actually get paid to write that sort of ****e and twist it how they like to suit.
Have you checked your dressing rooms for bugs? we do not want mighty Rodgers's highly valued advice to his team being known...
We're modifying Real's tactics, replacing Ronaldo with SAS. Pass to SAS > Did they score (Y/N) > repeat.