Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony! Bony!............................................ please log in to view this image
Fergie improved us in his first season, did great in his second and proceeded to overhaul the club. The signs were there that he was a capable manager. He was worth the time.
I would not trust Moyes with $150. He is simply not charismatic enough to get good players. That is actually my long term worry if we do chose to stick with Moyes. He is not a manager that top talents want to play for.
Fergie...it's his squad that Moyes is left with (the one that won the league last year....yeah yeah....yawn). It's ****e without van pee and rooney How the hell didn't Fergie spot that?? How many seasons did Fergie fail to strengthen that god awful midfield?? Who gave Moyes the thumbs up for the job??
Absolutely RIGHT!! The biggest mistake SAF made in his otherwise illustrious 26 years as manager was handing Moyes the job! Moyes never achieved anything as a player and very little as a manager, certainly not enough to warrant being in charge of a team the calibre of Untd. There is no way that Untd will finish in the top 4 of the Premiership, this year or next, if Moyes remains in charge. OUT, OUT, I say!!
is that why the board wanted to sack him? we fkn lost facing oxford 2-0 at his first match we were 4th at the season before he comes and end up 11th at his first season.. is that the kind improvement you were talking about ?
We were in the relegation zone when he came in November.... with Fergie we started off a little jittery but recovered well.
comn man .. tbh the progress was not that big .. we still lost 8 matches with Sir Alex at that season if you think that is the standard for a team finished 4th a season before, then you are wrong, if Sir Alex started from the start of season we could had lost 12-13 matches that season at this rate, still not good enough
Dude, Ferguson did not inherit a team that just won the league. Say what you say about how bad United squad was last year, the simple fact of the matter is that league position does not lie. They were the best for that year regardless of how people try to downplay it. Only a clown would inherit that team only to be losing every other home game.
I kinda hoped this whole jumping on the get rid of the manager bandwagon wasnt something my fellow fans would stoop to, the fact that many wouldnt even be willing to go along with Fergies request to stand by our manager is more hollowing than any loss on the pitch this year. Cmon I thought we could be better than the fans of certain other clubs who love the revolving manager policy
Van Persie being on fire papered over all the other cracks though, you all knew how bad your midfield had become post-Scholes and yet Fergie left it to struggle on squeezing all he could out of Giggs. At least Moyes tried to strengthen it in the summer but without van p, rooney and the hairdryer the rest of them look exactly what they are. Not awful but damn ordinary.
Name me one other top European club where it would be acceptable to lose 4 out of 6 home games against what used to be bogey teams. Name me a single club! The stand by your manager works to an extent. When a Championship winning team has no chance of making top four, that makes the situation unacceptable. It is called setting standards. If we want to watch United decline into a big middle table club, then let's all stand by our lovely manager.
It seems to me that Man U are in serious need of a couple of choppers.They were renowned for very good footballers and a couple of choppers. Nobby Stiles would kick a pedestrian if he walked in front of his car.......
