If you watch it back he puts his right leg into the defender purposefully. It did look bad on first watch though, undoubtedly clumsy defending.
Squarez was nowhere near the ball which was 3yds away with Dave and they really think it was a pen. Never been given in the history of football. Ridiculous claim.
Indeed. I see you're yet to actually respond in a substantive manner to anything. Does Suarez being nowhere near the ball not make Eto'o's hack at him even more bizarre? Can't believe I'm seeing an actual defence of it.
Ok. Let's remove the word 'hacked' and replace it with one more suitable to your discerning taste. We'll just call it a 'foul'. Yes, that will do.
By describing it as a 'hack' you have shown your comp!eye disregard for the truth. Your blind blinkered view is clear in your use of the word 'hack' and shows your mindset not to listen to reason anyway. You're like Suarez in that regard by exaggerating actual events. Always the victims.
Suarez might have been a diving cheat in the past, but the foul by Eto'o on him today was a definite penalty. He made absolutely no attempt to play the ball and simply stepped right across Suarez to deliberately bring him down. The fact that Webb was 5ft away and didn't give it was a ****ing abysmal decision. Chelsea got lucky today and basically got handed two points on a plate, and anybody who can't see that is a biased ****
I don't want to hurt your feelings so I will put this as delicately as I can......who the **** gives a **** what you think
I've placed your use of hyperbole in bold. You should try and cut it out if you want to encourage anyone to take your points seriously. FYI - 'hack' was more to describe Eto'o's movement than any intent. Who knows what he was thinking, after all. I imagine you're also fully aware of the connotations of 'always the victims'.
I couldn't give a flying ****ing Jizz whether you give a **** or not, your opinion doesn't change the fact that the foul on Suarez should have been a penalty. It was probably one of the most stonewall pens you'll see all season. If you can't see that then it just shows your bias, but I guess that's to be expected.
It saddens me that you are most likely aware of what such slogans connote, and still use them to score points on an internet forum. You clearly have no interest in the actual match. Not going to waste more of my time in this puerile back and forth.
Webb had a stinker and pretty much gifted Chelsea the three points. Mourinho has always been a lucky manager and he's had a boat load of luck this season which has put Chelsea in a false position. Neither Chelsea or Liverpool will be in the title shake up come the end of the season. City will win it comfortably with Arsenal their closest challenger.
Gifted us three points? Didn't see any controversy in one of the goals, Liverpool may have deserved a pen but there's still no guarantee they would've scored it. Jog on.
