As the title say's, How many more games should laudrup be allowed if we are still not winning and we drop into the relegation place. Should he be sacked after the villa game or when the window opens or should he stay until the end of the season and we buy a lottery ticket on whether we stay up or not...This could be very costly ..That would be a huge gamble on the way we are playing and the odds would favor going down. Do we risk it or not. This is a serious question as i would have sacked him long ago. discuss..
1. Who do we replace him with ? 2. Will his team of signings put in the effort for the new guy ? 3. Michu will want out the moment Laudrup goes,if in January where do we find a striker? 4. Can we afford the compensation package for sacking him ?
norway thats not the question is it....we would replace him like all sacked managers get replaced ....Jinks has probably thought of that long ago...
4. Can we afford the compensation package for sacking him ? look at it another way...can we afford to not sack him if we keep getting bad results....our premiership status is far more valuable and important than any manager who is poor..
Well... after Aston Villa, we then have Man City, Man Utd (League and Cup) and Tottenham. All those games are earmarked as losses so I wouldn't blame him no matter what the outcome in those. So in a purely hypothetical world, if we still haven't won by, and end up losing, the next derby - that would be my personal cut-off point.
Am I reading this or am I still under the influence of a partially defrosted undercooked turkey? How many more games? Why a stupid question!! First year in the prem, my hope was that we would have 20 points by the turn of the year as a path to getting the holy grail of 40 points by the end. We did it, but only just. This season, we have 20 points already, we may get a point or even three out of Villa, but even if we don't, you need to calm the **** down! How often are teams criticised for sacking a manager when they could just as easily have stuck with them? You're talking like we had a good chance against Chelsea when the pundits are saying Chelsea are still in contention fot the title. They have NEVER lost a game under Jose at the bridge. As for Everton, they are playing better football than I've seen them play in ten years. This is a thread that demonstrates three things: 1) how you've ended up on so many 'ignore' lists 2) just how poor your football knowledge is. 3) your grammar is never going to improve.
With a mountain of fixtures, a load of key injuries throughout, even whilst playing poorly and yet there are still 8 teams worse off, only an idiot IMO would even contemplate getting rid of our manager, and thankfully we have no idiots running our club
The OP is on my ignore list so I won't read his drivel but I read the title and thought Shaper's response deserved a repeat.
This thread is unmitigated garbage, so much so I'm not even going to dignify it with a response. Shameful!!!!!!
Oh God, I hope that everyone took my answer as hypothetical. My true feeling is to not sack Laudrup at all - he pledged allegiance to us (for this season at least) in the press and those morals shouldn't be rewarded with a knee-jerk sacking. However, I stand by my point that if we lose our next 8 games (7 in the league and one cup), the sacking of Laudrup will become a distinct possibility and it probably won't just be Dai calling for it by that point. But it's okay, because we'll beat Villa, Fulham, West Ham and Cardiff during that time, pick up draws at home to Man City and Tottenham and be sitting pretty on 34 points with 13 games to go
Kidderz - you are the biggest troublemaker on here. ****storms follow you everywhere. Stick the troll on Ignore ivor - if we all did it he'd be talking to himself. Now there's a thought......
When would you like to put the noose around his neck ? You only sing when your'e winning seems rather apt at the moment .I've never read such a lot of crap as this & fair play you've come out with some beauts , I can't get over the fact that actually started a thread of your own , minor rant over .
Simple answer. I wouldn't sack him. Why blame him for eveything ? Sure we can moan about the line up - but if Bony had started yesterday do you think we would have won ? If players pass like it's their first time then the manager can't be held responsible for that can he. The players have to take a large portion of blame for the recent substandard performances.
Dai seeing as you have created a thread about Laudrup, for future references can you please keep all negative comments about Laudrup in here as there will be no need to post them in other threads unrelated to Laudrup
Finally a bit of sense in this post haha Dai you heard the Mod, keep all your anti Swans crap to this thread in future Guys can you not all see Dai(and a few others) is on an agenda and that is just to **** stir as much as he can. You cant reason with him or change his views as he ONLY wants to **** stir
Just like you would have got rid of Huw Jenkins when we were in league one and the championship. We are lucky that most Swans fans see the big picture instead of offering knee JERK reactions. Will you be at Villa booing Sir Mike tomorrow?
I don't see what sacking him would do for us. The problems that can happen doing this. With Cardiff now sacking Malkey this can have one massive effect on the team. I'll be at Villa Park and ML will have my full support, win, lose or draw.
