So I win and get loads of points and take an unbeatable lead at the top....you see my wicked plan Next week I will try cheating a little more deviously
QPR 5..........0 Charlton Simpson x2 Austin Kranky Hoillett. And thanks Roller for allowing me to P.M. you my predictions if i will be away in future.
Roller just out of interest, this week there are a number of us predicting that Charlton will be on the receiving end of a thumping, quiet a lot of 4-0's, 4-1's 5-0's, but if their keeper plays a blinder and keeps it down to 1-0, those of us who predicted these thumpings will get bugger all points for the win. Is that correct even though the scores are not outrageous and if so maybe we should re-consider our predictions?..... Not a complaint....just some clarification
Does rule 2.4a subsection iiii really exist. I thought it had been invented for my benefit...and I was touched by your generosity. PS don't read rules anyhow...rules are for girls!!!
In the dim & distant past some rules were put in place during the first year this prediction comp was run but didn't think there were that many rules that required sub sections!!!!!!!!!
QPR 2-0 Charlton (Austin & Barton) I would like to believe some of the predictions of 4 or 5 to the R's, but can't see it with our injury struggles. I would've thought that this is a good fixture to give Hitchcock another run out.
I'm pretty sure that a lot of us, me included, now use this comp as a way of dealing with our superstitions. My 5-0 prediction should equal a 2-0 win, although I may have blown that apart by missing page 1. Page 1 for a home game, page 2 for our travels. If I have, I apologies and I will reimburse kilburns travel costs (very slowly over the next 30 years). If I'm right, there's no need for praise and thanks, we'll just let it go quietly. Of course, I probably have screwed it just by talking about it.
