The BBC can find footage from football events it filmed from as far back as the 1920's yet coincidentally footage of the worst football disaster this country has ever seen has gone missing a few months before the new inquests begin. http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news...nal-bbc-footage-hillsborough-disaster-6249827 Wouldn't come as a surprise if the SY police and Bettison are behind it.
The BBC had only recently agreed to release the unseen footage. WTF!!! Just who do they think they are? Evidence is evidence is evidence and the BBC are not immune to the principle of law. Then, funny old thing, it goes missing. So just what are the BBC trying to hide?
Not a co-incidence that a government minister has recently reminded the BBC they 'cannot take the Licence Fee for granted' when it comes up for renewal in 2016. I have a feeling this may help them....
And this **** backs up the theories as well. There's a brilliant interview with Russell Brand and Jeremy Paxman about corruption and a possible revolution...This kind of **** will enhance the need!
In the article it mentions the families had better quality footage then the lawyers were given Brand is right, it's a good interview even though Brand hadn't the slightest idea of what to do or how it should be. This every few years election thing is the big problem, they lie cos once they get in they are in for years so don't give a ****. Should be that enough signatures from the public get someone the sack, simple as, no more terms of office. is it not crazy that for the most important jobs in the country that they are not hired for what's on their CVs And why can't there be a an untainted by state media referendum on all important issues in society, local issues have local referendums. Look at Southampton, Doctors dentists and the public do not want Fluoride in their water and a judge says oh yes you are getting it in your water. Democracy as is means lobbyists and corruption and little or no accountability Sorry, bit OT.
Tobes, it's great, not for what he is saying but because he's a bit of a funny **** in stark contrast to Paxman, even jeremy couldnt keep a straight face
I think it's tragic that a clown like Brand is being placed into the 'voice of the left' comedy slot The man's a melt mate
Got to disagree Tobes,Brand is intelligent,articulate and has positive ideas on many social issues. Anyway,can we re- direct this to its own thread maybe.OP is too important
On a related theme, I just have a horrible, horrible feeling that Brookes and Coulson will walk on this phone-tapping, corruption thing. When they said that there's over twenty barristers lined up for the defendants.... The hand (and wallet) of Murdoch everywhere. Like trying to kill a ****ing cockroach.
Sorry Brand is just a joke. There's absolutely no point whatsoever in promoting revolution UNTIL such times as you have a clear idea of how you are going to install a new reality.
What a scummy organisation the BBC has been for all these years. A haven for crooks and *****'s. Maybe the tapes got buried with Jimmy Saville.