Please direct me to where anyone is having a go at the Allam's? This is a campaign against a name change, nothing about it is anti-Allam. FFS, how many times.
I thought the handling of Nick's sacking was disgusting, I still do, but it was almost eighteen months ago and I moved on a year ago. Maybe you should do the same, it's ancient history and it's affecting nobody's opinion on anything now. Apart from Erik taking the piss, there have not been anti-Allam posts on this board in relation to the name change or anything else. Facts straight please.
Condone. Verb Accept and allow (behavior that is considered morally wrong or offensive) to continue. Approve or sanction (something), esp. with reluctance. What have you done in order to avoid condoning it Robo? I don't approve of it Robo but acknowledge when my time and efforts should be channeled elsewhere. Living so far away there is little I can do. However I do spend hundreds each year on merchandise for me and my tribe. I will be abstaining until such time as the idea is dropped. I have channeled the money towards CTWD, North Ferriby United and Wealdstone FC.
For someone who claims to deal only in "cold hard facts" you're struggling a little with your standards here & in general come across as a hypocrite with double standards. You regularly whinge about people posting threads about the name change, criticise people for replying to posts that don't concern them, encourage people to "not stick their nose where it's not wanted" & tell them to "go spout their **** somewhere else" yet also claim that this is a public forum & you are free to post what you like where you like. You believe people should articulate themselves in a decent way & because some posters cannot fulfill this standard of yours they turn to insults & name calling, yet on many occasions you refer to people as a bunch of pricks, twats, and not as useful as a ****. You also make lame threats such as "you wouldn't to my face I can assure you" or " I am quite happy to meet anyone from here for a face to face discussion" Of course you'll deny these were threats but you know you were being a "keyboard warrior". You defend yourself when pulled up regarding schoolboy like spelling mistakes such as your inability to spell "lose", yet when others have made similar mistakes you suggest they are not only "silly boys" but also need "Janet & John" books. You also recommend they use spellchecker before posting. Funnily enough, despite not supporting the campaign to stop the name change you are quite clear that if the owners do change their mind you'll first to thank them. (the owners) Now we've had a look at the "cold hard facts" about you let's get back on topic. You said "these are exactly the same ones who had a go over Nick Barmby getting the sack" in reference to people who are involved in, or supporting, the campaign to maintain our name. That's me. "Exactly" leaves no room for maneuver. I vilified people on here for the contempt aimed at our owners over NB's dismissal These facts, & they are facts, invalidate your argument completely. Although I have no doubt you'll make something else up in another lame attempt to validate your crusade against those campaigning to preserve our club's name. I'm not confused, but it does appear yourself & others have no idea what you actually do want, how you want it & how others should go about achieving it for you, Your only purpose is to argue against anybody speaking out against the name change. Your posts appear nothing more than sly digs & at times threats aimed at people who support the campaign. (see above) If the name you'd prefer is Hull City, why have you not previously expressed your dislike of the three words "Association Football Club"? (the three words that actually identify us as to what we are). Is it a dislike borne out of recent events or is it a dislike you've been burdened with for a while? Have you put any effort into informing the owners what your preferred choice of name would be & why? Why do you think we need a change? What will be the benefits of dropping "Association Football Club" from our name? You've put a lot of effort into telling others what they should & shouldn't be doing, maybe your efforts would be better served trying to achieve what you want yourself. It's a little lame & weak criticising & threatening others whilst doing nothing yourself.
The club are still officially pushing Hull City Tigers this season outside of the Premier League... please log in to view this image
This one? A direct quote in response to people contacting the owners regarding the name change. "I would suggest that you and everyone else will be flogging a dead horse m8 as they are not for turning. Don't get me wrong I will be the first to thank them if they do but I won't hold my breath." All others are direct quotes too, I promise - Cold Hard Facts only - remember!! Why do you insult people? When others do this you suggest it is because they are losing the argument. You have nothing positive to add to the name change argument, either for or against. Your main purpose appears to be insulting people, telling them that they have no right responding to posts & being critical of their spelling yet, you're continually protesting at people insulting you, always declaring your right to post what you like as it's a public forum & defending your own the childlike composition, grammer & spelling of your posts saying it's irrelevant. The cold hard facts are there for all to see. Pure hypocrite.
Following a barrage of complaints by Hull City fans on Twitter, York City have changed the fixture details on their website, Hull City Youth will now be playing York City Youth, as normal.
sprouted = spouted. loosing = losing, FFS I even spelt it right for you in my post "Read the damn post not what you want it to be, if they do turn I will be the first to thank them as it will put an end to all the crap sprouted on here by you and others." - The only one sprouting (ha ha ha) crap is you. Your thanks confirm you don't want a name change, which makes the aggression you direct at those attempting to head off the change hard to fathom & understand. I've read it numerous times & cannot see the part in bold anywhere, have you just added this to try & add value to your meaningless statement? "I know 6 people who have had enough of this namechange which would suggest that you are loosing the argument" - this just doesn't make sense, either with or without the childlike spelling mistake. (Janet & John?). "how many of your group will not buy anything from the club or not renew season tickets, not many I would suggest" - They're not my group, but why are you so concerned about it? Why does it annoy you to the extent that you feel the need to threaten people? "OLM for one called me a twat therefore in my book that entitles me to call him back" - Na na na na na na, very mature. Fair play to him, good point well made. I'm surprised you didn't offer to meet him face to face like you have others "wouldn't say that to my face scooter boy" You're not consistent in your values, very poor effort. Please try harder.
Ha ha insult away, it amuses me greatly as it actually highlights further your lack of intelligence, values, standards & principles. A wise old sage once told me, & I quote "If you cannot articulate yourself in a decent way why bother at all" ha ha ha. Why have you made edits to the last 7 pages of your posts? Infact you've changed them all to "." Have you been found out?
What's it got to do with you? I am now conforming to the norm on here so **** off you uppity little twat.