1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Irony - Diving: Palace chief calls for red cards

Discussion in 'Hull City' started by Happy Tiger, Sep 16, 2013.

  1. Happy Tiger

    Happy Tiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    15,983
    Likes Received:
    7,359
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/24105809

    I'm half giggling and half bemused. No wonder they wanted Holloway there, peas in a deluded pod.

    I actually agree with the sentiment, divers should be sent off, the message would soon get through. The Palace chairman calling for it though is just chuffed up.
     
    #1
  2. John. Walkington.

    John. Walkington. Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    3,798
    Likes Received:
    14
    #2
  3. Amin Yapusi

    Amin Yapusi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    35,957
    Likes Received:
    15,934
    I agree that rules on diving have to be harsher, but I'm not sure about straight red, there are genuine fouls with contact that get blown up for diving plenty of times a season, that would suddenly turn into a host of wrongful dismissals. I know the league chiefs don't like to overpower referees once a decisions been made on the pitch so it would probably never happen, but I think upon sufficient video evidence analysis post match sanctions should be handed out to anyone caught diving, maybe both fines and bans.

    However, I don't see how cheating to score a goal is any different to cheating to prevent a goal, ultimately they achieve the same advantage, and the on pitch penalty for one is just a booking where as the other is a straight red. Baffling.
     
    #3
  4. bum_chinned_crab

    bum_chinned_crab Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    21,807
    Likes Received:
    6,317
    Why dont they puinish people retrospectively? It happens in Italy, handing bans out when tv evidence proves a dive, so why dont they do it here? Are they serious about it or not?

    But it really is comical them complaining about it. How many pens did they get last year - wasnt it in the teens?
     
    #4
  5. Brucebones

    Brucebones Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Messages:
    8,270
    Likes Received:
    3,391
    They do it for fouls so why not. I hate diving but it has been shown in the pat that sometime the player is moving so quick that the slightest click will send them flying. I doubt though that Ashley Young will get many more in the coming months, he'll be the boy who cried wolf from now on.
     
    #5
  6. PLT

    PLT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    13,706
    They were very unlucky with those decisions on Saturday but no one deserves it more than Palace.
     
    #6
  7. bum_chinned_crab

    bum_chinned_crab Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    21,807
    Likes Received:
    6,317
    Yep, he's going to end up suffering from it and I suspect this is the REAL reason Moyes is annoyed at him and he's covering it under the guise of fair play.

    Sometimes it is difficult to prove a dive as even when it's not a foul people can fall over and it look like a dive, but Young makes such an obvious movement with his leg towards the defender that it really is undoubted. Will Moyes and indeed Roy drop him and make a public point of why they did it? If they did the message would soon get home.
     
    #7
  8. Happy Tiger

    Happy Tiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    15,983
    Likes Received:
    7,359
    I like and agree with the bolded bit. Probably better than on the spot as like has been said, sometimes its not always obvious.
     
    #8
  9. Oregon Tiger

    Oregon Tiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    3,142
    Likes Received:
    1,072
    It's very ironic coming from Palace. Last season they could have trouble raising a team for some games if this had been applied to them.

    I agree with harsher penalties for perpetrators. It is cheating and it has massive implications. Think about this scenario: last game of the season someone takes a dive (let's call him Mr Y). It isn't spotted by the referee, who incorrectly gives a penalty which is scored and the team that suffered from this are relegated as a result.

    The relegation kicks in pay reductions for some of the squad, others are released and other cuts are made to account for the reduced income. The cheating player has caused some of his professional colleagues to lose their jobs and/or get pay cuts. They must be too stupid and too self centered to understand the implications of their actions: otherwise how could they sleep at night?

    It probably wouldn't work, but how about making this the responsibility of the PFA and have the players police it themselves?
     
    #9
  10. CANADATIGER

    CANADATIGER Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    3,483
    Likes Received:
    1,839
    While Ashley Young is a notorious diver I think the penalty call was correct in this instance. As Oregon says it is truly ironic that Holloway should be complaining after Palace's penalty awards after numerous dives by Zaha etc last season. But I don't agree with harsher penalties except in really blatant cases as the refs in my opinion often get these "judgement calls" wrong. Very difficult calls to make.
     
    #10

  11. Diddy

    Diddy Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    427
    Likes Received:
    6
    Spot on. Cheating diving jessies - had it not been for useless referees getting conned they wouldn't have been anywhere near the playoffs last year
     
    #11

Share This Page