1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Is Howard Webb a

Discussion in 'Southampton' started by CBK, Aug 31, 2013.

?

Is Howard Webb a...

  1. ****

  2. ****

  3. ****

  4. ****

  5. ****

  6. ****

  7. ****

  8. ****

  9. ****

  10. ****

  11. ****

  12. ****

  13. ****

  14. ****

  15. ****

Multiple votes are allowed.
Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Joe!

    Joe! Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Messages:
    18,397
    Likes Received:
    71
    The equal voting distribution is very impressive.
     
    #21
  2. SaintLapras

    SaintLapras Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    11,174
    Likes Received:
    1,813
    If it's any consolation, we were screwed over by the ref as well so we can be united in solidarity!
     
    #22
  3. Piebacca

    Piebacca Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    7,739
    Likes Received:
    739
    Just like Fonte last week, when he destroyed John O'Shea's nose "accidentally.":)
     
    #23
  4. Piebacca

    Piebacca Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    7,739
    Likes Received:
    739
    So the referee tried to strangle a Chesterfield player?:1980_boogie_down:
     
    #24
  5. Canary Rob

    Canary Rob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2011
    Messages:
    11,459
    Likes Received:
    3,780
    Yes it does, learn the referee instructions.

    Serious foul play in terms of a tackle doesn't have to be deliberate. In order to get sent off for a swinging arm the ref has to be certain it wasn't a natural bodily movement and the intention was to hit the other player - I.e. it has to have been intentional, which means deliberate
     
    #25
  6. Canary Rob

    Canary Rob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2011
    Messages:
    11,459
    Likes Received:
    3,780
    See above - depends on the manner of the foul play. If it's off the ball violence, it has to be deliberate.
     
    #26
  7. #42

    #42 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2013
    Messages:
    1,180
    Likes Received:
    11
    Intention to hurt the opponent is irrelevant for serious foul play and violent conduct. Learn the rules.
     
    #27
  8. ollysaints1

    ollysaints1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2011
    Messages:
    2,976
    Likes Received:
    33
    How on earth he didn't give the penalty for the Bradley Johnson handball is beyond me, he was ****ing looking at it from less than a metre away. Bald clueless ****.
     
    #28
  9. Canary Rob

    Canary Rob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2011
    Messages:
    11,459
    Likes Received:
    3,780
    Seriously you haven't a clue. You are conflating two very different offences. You don't need intention for serious foul play. Violent conduct is completely different.

    It is impossible that intention to commit violent conduct is irrelevant to be violent conduct given that the mens rea of violent conduct is intention. If there was no violent conduct, it would either be careless or dangerous, it cannot be violent. That's why you can perfectly legitimately break someone's nose and not get sent off if, in swinging your arm, you were neither acting recklessly nor intending to hurt.

    You obviously need to learn referee's guidance. Intention is imperative in off the ball incidents.
     
    #29
  10. RickieLambertsGoldenBoot

    RickieLambertsGoldenBoot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,391
    Likes Received:
    37
    Omg that last sentence has just had me in stitches! <laugh>
     
    #30

Share This Page