Get me some figures for how many members have left LUST since Bates left then. Oh wait your argument is baseless hot air and you have no credible sources to back up what you say. What ever reasons people joined LUST it still has a large membership which hasn't significantly (or at all) shrunk away since Bates departure.
Please state your beliefs regarding the commonly acknowledge greenhouse theory (C02 absorbing IR Radiation warming the Earth) because you haven't offered 1 reason why you disbelieve it never mind actual scientific sources to back you up. All you come up with is some stupid 'Global Warming IS NOT man-made' yet you don't even try to give scientific reasons for completely writing off any chance of man-made global warming. Why? I suspect because you don't have a clue about what your taking about and if you was drawn into a scientific argument over global warming rather than a pub argument then you'd be out of your depth because you wouldn't have a clue where to start getting proper scientific backing (i.e backed up by research, studies, scientific surveys, forumulas, computer simulations ect) for your theories.
Stop with the willy waving. Contrary to the picture you are painting. It's not complicated the change in climate is 100% within the tolerances expected in the cycle of warming and cooling. Your hand wringing and trying to blind with science is wrong its just you don't want to believe it. Now can we move on. Everyone else is bored. Btw the earth is round.
Phuk this, go read either of the Ross has signed threads. Much more interesting. Ps, How will Marko reflect this in his naming
Thanks for your link to that incredible scientific research disproving the majority of the world's climate scientists....oh **** i'm talking to GH....nevermind.
Is it bollocks....it's yestardays news....catch up. Leeds to sign Joey Barton (my sources say GFH have decided to send Bates off with a late leaving gift for Suzannah, just waiting for the gimp suit and he's on the next flight to Monaco) you heard it here first
I've already stated on this thread the detail surrounding the LUST/Haigh statements. You either ignored it, or you simply just want to rant bollox again. Or should I say yet again.
Why don't you go back & read what I've already stated. Or is the obvious nature of my statement too much for your fragile ego to take?
WJ - I am extremely grateful to LUST in helping usto come together and get rid of that old goat. But I've not kept up. What's its focus now? Serious question, not taking thepiss, and not asking thelust haters for their opinion either
You stated that haters should go to a meeting or stream one of the yawnathons. Much easier if you just answer this question: Did Haigh lie when he said LUST did not have anything to do with introducing gfh to LUFC? Yes or no?
Item #120 in this thread pasted below (as you struggle to read stuff that proves you wrong) .... The GFH statement was very carefully worded, and probably only issued due to pressure from Bates. It's a matter of interpretation. LUST were speaking to a chap who was specifically engaged by GFH to help them with the TO. He was never a regular employee of GFH, hence they were able to carefully word that statement. If you'd like to hear it from the horse's mouth, send in that specific question over Twitter or FB at the next meeting. Now that should answer your question. Pity you've not been able to provide evidence to support your rantings. We're still waiting & I suppose we always will. Ever considered a career in politics? They have spots open for people like you that won't respond to factual statements and prefer to spout unrelated drivel. You've missed your calling.
