Yep, as expected, they have their heads up Chelsea's arse. Hardly mentioned us. EDIT: Since I wrote that we have been talked about a bit. Still heads up arses for Chelsea though.
MOTD2 just showed two excellent passages of passing from Hull as evidence of their ineffectual play. That makes sense.
They said we played good passing football, but all in our half. They said we lacked penetration. They said Chelsea were outstanding in the first half. They said we would have easier games than today. I struggle to see what was wrong with that summary
More the fact they talked about Chelsea for 10 minutes, Mourinho alone for 10 minutes, and us for about 2 minutes.
Holloway whinging about ****ing officials already! Going to change channels whenever palace are on now.
Holloway being a **** blaming the officials as per usual. It's never his teams fault. Always the referees fault. Holloway: And ****ing grow a pair you dick.
Bloody hell no ones ever happy. It's a hell of a lot longer then what we got on The FLS, be thankfull. I thought they showed a lot of us and had some good comments to say.
The thing that annoyed me was not mentioning that we improved massively and dominated possession once we got our best players on the pitch. They completely overlooked the impact those subs had and just put it down to Chelsea going easy on us.
Well to be fair, that's exactly what it was. And what they said was spot on too. We dominated posession, but only in our own half. In typical Mourinho fashion they got their comfortable lead and kept it. We could have the ball in defence and midfield as long as we liked, but we could still be playing now and I'm sure we still wouldn't have broken through that defence.
