for an undisclosed fee........how bizarre... £5000 and £10000 a goal £5000 per assist £5200 per appearance for 3 years............... then we get him back for free as we are in the prem
Since it's undisclosed, I reckon we either caved for less than a million, or we won't be receiving the full million due to a clause in his tribunal contract where a percentage goes to Barnet. Still, it's enough money at this level to buy both a striker and another player. We could also do with a loan or two for backup, or a youngster that will keep the likes of Fontaine on his toes/out of the team.
or we could of asked for is to be undisclosed so that other teams don't know how much cash we have spare to spend on their strikers
I'd like it to be this reason, but have a horrible feeling it's because we've caved under a million. Come on, it's how we do things isn't it?
A lot of transfers seem to be undisclosed these days- The clubs obviously have their reasons but it would be nice to know.
I have just discovered this bit of info....... Non-league Barnet are owed 20% of the profit Bristol City have made on Adomah. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/23616884 What a bastard that's £200k gone.....
If it was a million then Barnet get 20% of 850K = £170K the difference between what we paid and sold him for, unless the reason it is undisclosed is that it was £1M and Boro also paid Barnet. The same deal Swindon tried to make us pay perhaps we learned from them.