Liuzzi - Nearing Decent. Unlucky. Pic - Possibly a good driver. Di Grassi - Average Van Der Garde - Uncertain. Chandhok - Did OK at HRT (though worse than Senna), wasted his chance at Lotus. Karthikeyan - Poor. Chilton - Even Worse. Yamamoto - To his credit he fared well (as in only a few tenths slower) at HRT, but that was against rookies who knew they team wanted them out. Woeful everywhere else.
Pic - I think he is quite good and deserves a stay in F1 Chandhok - a lost talent in F1 alongside Bruno Senna Liuzzi - never saw the fuss Van Der Garde - Average at best Yamamoto - at least he was good as a test driver Karthikeyan - Poor Chilton - even poorer
Liuzzi Pic di Grassi Kathikeyan - lynch me if you want, the guy was impressive in Formula 3 Chandhok Chilton van der Garde Yamamoto
He's also never lost to Ricciardo as team mates, who could partner Vettel, statistically speaking he will lose to him at least once. His best finish is the same as di Resta's who as we all know is better than Vettel proven by F3 and so adding logic you get Karthikeyan > Vettel and is a 76x WDC
Pic - Looks an OK driver, should be on the grid, no reason for him not to be Liuzzi - Never blessed with luck, did well considering things always went against him Di Grassi - If he was deemed worthy of being Renault's test driver during the glory years, he couldn't be that bad. The fact he's now an Audi Factory driver shows that Chandhok - Beat Bruno Senna, so he's not too bad VDG - Not sure if F1 standard, would be a decent test driver Chilton - Worst driver currently on the grid, but better than the 2 clowns up next Karthikeyan - Bad driver, but not as bad as Yamamoto Yamamoto - Did he buy his superlicense?
Thanks that was interesting to see how people ranked the lesser F1 drivers, I wish I had remembered to put Badoer in though
