Didn't say you would, but if Madrid want him, he'll go, and there is nothing to be gained from stopping him.
David Ornstein knows his stuff. You can see now why Liverpool have reacted badly to the bid because it was made with the sole intention of unsettling Suarez further and straining relationships between himself and the club.
Dead decent them football agents. Game would be in a right state if wasn't for their high moral stance. And Suarez is a paragon of virtue. So that article must be true.
Suarez can talk to the club but doesn't mean we have to accept their bid. I just hope we stay strong.
I never said I thought it was true, personally I'm just waiting to see how things pan out. I just hope the club have a replacement lined up as it's inevitable he'll be leaving one way or another.
Of course not but I think Liverpool don't want to let him talk to us which is going to annoy him and hopefully (from our point of view) make him kick up a fuss about it.
What exactly is the point of having a clause that means you have to 'consider' an offer but don;t have to accept? I see the point of having no release clause at all or a clause that means you have to let the player go if it is met. Really can't see from Liverpool's or the player's point of view, the point of this alleged clause.
Yep, fair point. In addition, I think the clause in the contract is ambigious - both parties (Suarez and his agent, and LFC) seem to have a different view on it which could get messy (court?).