Yes he did, albeit unintentionally. Once, he used the word the word negro - so he broke rule E3 (standard tariff = 3 game ban) and made reference to race ONCE (standard tariff = additional game ban). For which both he and the club apologised, btw. What he got was twice what Terry got for the same offence, and eight games more than Evra who started the argument, broke rule E3 by his own admission, and also made reference to race, according to the FA's own guidelines on rule E3, by referring to Suarez as a Sudac and delivering his diatribe in Spanish. But the FA dismissed this as an 'oath', like the average Frenchman would say when he caught his finger in the car door. If you are genuinely interested in racism you should ask yourself why evra, who gave at least as good as he got and was abusive, racist, and started the argument anyway, was given exemption from any form of censure or prosecution. the FA commended him for admitting what he'd called suarez - even though this only came to light when they sat down in private with Evra and trawled through the vt to - unsuccessfully - find any evidence to back up evra's claim that Suarez had done anything more than he'd already admitted to on the day. So, why did evra get special status and a 115 page report that completely contradicts itself at every twist and turn? The word racism springs to mind...
Not just you. The bent and twisted English press, and porcine ****ers such as Samuel, Lawton and Powell are in the vanguard of the persecution too.
@ the tags. darko's dad=dead, darko's mum=dead, darkos mum raped by darky, donga monga darko, scouse ****wits
You are, of course, going to provide evidence where I denied any of the above (except the ankle-breaking one - when was this?).
The tags aren't mine ya mad fanny. Is the Liverpool board full of lunatics like Darko, or is he a special case?
Yes, the type of lunatics who ban anyone who ventures onto their board regardless of their intentions
There's actually some really decent Liverpool posters on this forum who you can have a good discussion with and who don't go out of theior way to find a conspiracy in everything that goes against their team on and off the field. Donga isn't one of them.
the standard Soviet response to people who rightly challenged bent, totaliterian courts and officialdom.
the standard response from paranoid loonies when people point out that their views might be a teensy weensy bit far fetched.
ironic that this thread then is a about a supposed conspiracy of silence by Liverpool Football club and its fans over an event for which even a cursary look would see there was a thread for on our board, that the club has issued a communique for each year and for which there is a commemorative plaque at the the Anfield ground. If i was looking for conspiracies I'd point out opportunistic, ghoulish opposition fans trying to create an attitude of denial by Liverpool and its fans over an event in which 39 innocent people lost their lives. I won't, as it's not a conspiracy - it's a ****ing blatantly obvious piece of ham-fisted tribalism at its lowest. The only conspiracy is how this event is now used to deflect the consequences of the Hillsborough cover-up now tht the truth on that is finally undeniable. Wouldn't surprise me if some of you scum were briefed by SYP.
If you read this forum regulalrly you will see vitriol and stick beating aimed at a whole heap of clubs and its supporters. United get it, Newcastle and sunderland get it, Celtic and rangers get it and probably more besides. I suppose it can't be easy having a mirror held up in your face though so perhaps we should be more sensitive in the future. I could turn your final sentence on its head and say it's interesting how since the Hillsborugh cover up was revealed some of you (a tiny tiny minority for the beenfit of any doubt) regard it as exhonoration for what happened 4 years earlier and hit out at anyone who suggests there may have been the teeniest hint of culpability by any Liverpool fan that night.
