Poyet

More comments and Suarez was in the middle of his ban when the transfer went through to Liverpool, here is some more from comments.

Suarez escaped censure at the time but on Monday his club banned him for two games despite the Dutch FA (KNVB) still investigating the incident. He will also pay a fine to charity.

Sounds familiar ???


Suarez had said after the game: 'No, I do not regret what happened. Normally I always keep calm but I didn't... I'm a little tired. This week I had to travel a lot

 

Where in that does it say Ajax wanted rid?

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...z-is-prepared-to-quit-Ajax-for-Liverpool.html

The Eredivisie side’s new manager, Frank de Boer, has stripped the Uruguay international of the captaincy after a number of controversial incidents and is thought to be resigned to losing the striker.

Stripping him of the captaincy sounds like they wanted rid doesn't it.

 

Did Rafa want to get rid of Hyypia when arrived to then? Afterall, the captaincy was taken off Sami and low and behold, he was well and truly out of there just four short years later!!!!

There is ****all in there about Ajax wanting rid. There is however, comments of Suarez wanting to move on but without direct quotes.

 

Also..........

On 20 November 2010, Suárez was in trouble again when he bit PSV's Otman Bakkal on the shoulder during a 0–0 draw. Ajax suspended him for two games and fined him an undisclosed amount which the club said they would donate to a "good cause".[41] The Dutch daily newspaper De Telegraaf branded Suárez the "Cannibal of Ajax".[36][42] The KNVB increased Suárez's suspension to seven league matches.[43] Suárez apologized for his actions through a video he uploaded to his Facebook page.[36] During the suspension Ajax was in contact with other European clubs interested in Suárez; on 28 January 2011 they accepted a €26.5 million (£22.8 million) offer for Suárez from Premier League club Liverpool.[44][45] Despite leaving while suspended, Suárez departed Ajax on good terms, and he was given a farewell sendoff after an Ajax game

 

Because he's a grade A ****.

 

Also..........

On 20 November 2010, Suárez was in trouble again when he bit PSV's Otman Bakkal on the shoulder during a 0–0 draw. Ajax suspended him for two games and fined him an undisclosed amount which the club said they would donate to a "good cause".[41] The Dutch daily newspaper De Telegraaf branded Suárez the "Cannibal of Ajax".[36][42] The KNVB increased Suárez's suspension to seven league matches.[43] Suárez apologized for his actions through a video he uploaded to his Facebook page.[36] During the suspension Ajax was in contact with other European clubs interested in Suárez; on 28 January 2011 they accepted a €26.5 million (£22.8 million) offer for Suárez from Premier League club Liverpool.[44][45] Despite leaving while suspended, Suárez departed Ajax on good terms, and he was given a farewell sendoff after an Ajax game

 

No. But the phrase "resigned to losing the striker" certainly sounds like he isn't happy for him to go.

And the headline is "Luis Suárez is prepared to quit Ajax for Liverpool" which also makes it sound like his choice not Ajax's desire.

 

There you go facts, but put on your red coloured blinkers, have a nice day.

 

Still nothing about Ajax wanting rid. Plus, that looks like its taken from wiki

 

Wiki is fantastic isnt it.

 

Read my responses, you are yet to back up your claim that Ajax wanted rid

 

Can be if used properly: ie, in an attempt to back up your claim!

 

You wonder why liverfool get the bad press they get, and why you lot are always the victim???
Its due to bell ends like you.

Congrats for the most limp wrist response I have seen on not606 this year its just makes no sense
And being literate take a look in the mirror you cretin

 

It is gospel.

 

Of course

 

Taking apart, for one moment, the levels of insults being hurled about, I can see Sisu's point. Newcastle United employed Bowyer and Woodgate after their 'problems' - no mention of not giving them a chance. As for Gazza, a flawed genius, if ever there was one. Some of his behaviour was far from exemplary, even on the pitch.

I get what you're saying, but seriously, drop the Boris line about scousers being victims, will you?

The general feeling is that Suarez hasn't been fairly treated by the FA over the clash with Evra, what with there calling his ever-changing testimony 'impressive and reliable' and delivering an 8 match ban on the back of such biased (or at least perceived) view of the event. That other players have gotten away with blatent forearm smashes that have broken noses, 'challenges' at knee height that are let go because the officials saw them (or more correctly didn't see them clearly enought to deal with them correctly at the time) despite them being possible career-enders, seems to be lost in the hysteria the media wants to generate over this.

 

I had seen the abuse in this post but didn't say anything because it was in response to Sisu. Sisu as the biggest culprit on this board for dishing out insults and continues to do so despite me asking him not to numerous times.

Two wrongs don't make a right but asking a poster not to insult soneone that continuous insults everyone else seems a little immoral to me

 

Like you say Gerrez, two wrongs etc. An eye for an eye leaves everyone blind...

 

I'm keeping an eye on it. Don't want to have to issue bans (temp or perm) to our own but if I am left with no choice...