It wasn't pretty and we were nowhere near our best, but we dug in and gained a valuable point. Under Hughes we would have crumbled, to be honest we wouldn't have gone 1 0 up and we would have lost by the odd goal if not more. Onwards and upwards, you Rsssssssssss
Harry is merely doing his best with our limited resources, things will change but for now we're hard to beat...
This was nothing to do with you defending well. We battered you for the entire second half and created chance after chance after chance and if we could finish it would have been at least 4 or 5. You were VERY lucky to get the point.
It's a low aspiration to just be better than the Hughes era. It's not enough given we are bottom of the league. Again, Harry needs to strengthen. It's midfield that's the problem. Faurlin or Granero should come in.
I's called defending, trixter, and we are defending well recently. Not pretty but as the point shows, effective.
Just reminds me of the home game when they had 8 players booked. Not an academy any more is it under big Sam
So, you're a bit better than us at football. Go and have **** about how brilliant you are somewhere else.
Totally agree. The claws are out on the other thread, unfortunately: 'Harry got it wrong', 'Possession not good enough', blah, blah, blah. Pretty dull stuff, really. Would had loved all three, but when do we get a point at WHU, let alone three? Good point.
Good result although we should have scored again in the first half when WH were looking suicidally poor in defence.
