Bit random coming from the Scottish Daily Express. http://www.scottishdailyexpress.co....ester-City-player-Scott-Sinclair-escape-route
Yes please. But he needs to come with a better attitude than when he was on loan from Chelsea. Would certainly have a point to prove.
He must be kicking himself....going all the way to City to sit on the bench when if he had any sense he could he been part of a very good swans side.....must have been the money......
My first thought is this is made up crap, BUT if there is any truth I could see us off loading Hoilett as they pratically play in the same position. That's why I think this is untrue.
he was great in the championship...... not so great in the PL. tbh i think if he went back to us now he would be a bench warmer as he is with city. one thing which i will say about him is that he came to swansea to play football because he could not get game time with chelsea, so i was confused as hell when he moved on in search of a bigger pay packet. did he really think he could break into their team? anyway i would leave him be if i was arry, doesn't bring much besides a bigger wage burden if you do down.
Not sure what your wingers are like at the moment but Scott Sinclair is definitely someone you should NOT be looking at. He is not at all a team player and will just add to the idividuality of your team. Wasn't so bad with us as his attitude was not the norm. But no matter how bad he played or how often he disappeared in the games (he often did) Brendan would never drop him, ever. When the rumour came up of man city being interested offering about 5-6m, there was a unanimous 'sell' across our board. Good with his runs and loves a shot, but just a very average prem player, very very average.
It's rubbish. He's already played for Swansea and Man City this season so you can't sign him until the summer. Football League clubs could sign him on an emergency loan as they don't count, but PL clubs can't do those between each other without special dispensation which you wouldn't get.
