Strange he uses Mackie and not Hoillet as well as his other strange choices. If he brings on H it will be for Adel I'm afraid. Adel set up granero who should have scored. Zamora is just giving the ball away - like him off for Cisse.
But theres no point in starting SWP and leaving us with too much work to do after he goes off when we are usually a goal or 2 down. He has to start that way.
70 mins for Hoilett and Adel to be on the same pitch. SWP starting again. Starting to question things now. Why not start the team line up that is more effective(usually the line up post 60 mins) instead of back to the lineup you change every game at that point?
IF Hughes had got it right in the first place, we wouldn't have gone 2 goals down, ergo no reorganisation necessary. He is tactically inept. Thanks for pointing that out.
West Brom's substitutions have helped us. Long and Odemwingie were far more dangerous than the couple of donkeys they've sent on.
Why, it's the manager who brought the players in. The under performing players were from the previous regime (board and manager).
Yet Hughes is still playing them with better alternatives on the bench, whos fault is that? There is simply no excuse for playing SWP especially after we started performing last season and got all our wins without him in the team.
Agree SW Ranger but it takes until halfway through the second half before MH gets it right, and then repeats the same mistake in the next game. Its like fu3king groundhog day FFS.
