Think i have stumbled on a.........

ok so i'll post the races and the results for the next week. You have to understand though it's the first and second favorite in certain races that i will be documenting. So please don't argue with me over which horse. I will say it again, we bet on the first and second favorite in certain races

 

two horse races?

 

ok here is the link, fingers crossed i don't get kicked off
http://horseracingeverydaywins.comuv.com/

 

Just in case

 

there are two system races tomorrow which i will post up in the morning.

 

thank you ron.

 

It will take more than that to impress anyone here Sam. Also The "we do the betting for you" is about as suspicious as you could make it.

 

The software that i have is nothing short of amazing, all i have to do is enter the races that will win, press start and hey presto, off it goes, dutches the 2 faves for me 1 minute before the off.

 

So the race selection isn't automatic? Dutching a 1/6 fav is interesting.

 

This should be fun..... (apologies for cynicism)

So each day you will put up the races in the morning in which you will state that either the first or second favourite will win.

You will be staking a specified amount before the off on both the first and second favourite and you will show a profit.

I will watch with interest, good luck.

 

If money isn't asked to change hands at the end of this I will be truly shocked. Interested to see how it goes though.

The spiel down the left of the page is like so many other get rich schemes and like Ron the change from 'I' to 'our unique staking plan' set alarm bells ringing even more so.

You also said 'this guy is a genius' so this means one of two things. One this isn't your system and you're flogging it off or secondly you're talking about yourself in the 3rd person. Neither inspire confidence.

I may be wrong here, so if Mr. Lunch would like to clear it up it would be great, but I get the impression that this system started being tested 2 days ago.

 

SAM'S STRAGETY OF GETTING INTO THE PUNTER'S POCKET. "ATTACK THE MIND."

Research dealing with various aspects of the theory of planned behavior
(Ajzen, 1985, 1987) is reviewed, and some unresolved issues are discussed. In
broad terms, the theory is found to be well supported by empirical evidence.
Intentions to perform behaviors of different kinds can be predicted with high
accuracy from attitudes toward the behavior, subjective norms, and perceived
behavioral control; and these intentions, together with perceptions of behavioral
control, account for considerable variance in actual behavior. Attitudes,
subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control are shown to be related to
appropriate sets of salient behavioral, normative, and control beliefs about the
behavior, but the exact nature of these relations is still uncertain.

Icek Ajzen.

Sam, I think the above means that the forum think you're full of ****. (In the nicest sense of course.)

 

Thanks Sam.

I will wait to see the selections and go from there.

 

Morning guys, cheers for letting me show you my system

Yarmouth 2.20
Yarmouth 2.50
Ayr 3.10

Dutch the 2 faves at the last minute before the race starts.
Stop at the first win.

I have been doing the same thing on and off for roughly 10 years, but not documented the results i was getting, and not with the key ingredient of having the betting software. I bought the betting software like last week.

I don't know any other systems or formula that can guarentee a win every day.

Let the games begin....

 

I don't get what the 'software' does? If you're picking the races and betting on the first and second favourite, what is there left for the software to do?

 

Whilst we drift off into the realms of quick wins and riches only Croesus could dream of .. a big THANK YOU to the Princess for her advice yesterday on the Cecil horse .. was it HOT SNAP .. a cheeky tenner brought home a nice return ... many thanks to the insightful one ....

PS ... the new software clearly doesnt recognise that Ayr is off ...........but lets see how the other 2 go on today ...

 

Jayzus, samslunch, you're gonna put Boris '****in' Fenster out of business?

 

I’m always very wary of any system which advises ‘stop at a winner’. Why, would you do this if your strongest fancy of the day was running later on (say selection 3 of 3)?!?

This seems very similar to the system which used to be about, it still maybe for all I know, which concentrated on non odds-on favourites and told you also to ‘stop at a winner’. Basically, you would put £x on the first favourite. If it lost you would then double your stake on the next and so on until you got a winner. In theory you were always sure to win on the day...unless of course no non odds-on favourites won and then you faced a massive, and I do mean massive, loss.

 

and whilst i'm on ... Sam suggests that the player '....stops at the first win ' ... shooooooorrrlllly we are looking at two random events here .. if the first race produces a return what possible effect does it have on the outcome of the second race ?? ... I'm intrigued ... but sad to say very sceptical ...

 

Hi Ron - Is the Clock wrong on the server ? my last post says 10:00 am ... unless Chester has become a victim of a slip in the space time continuum ...