1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

O/t Kate Miiddleton

Discussion in 'Hull City' started by Gazthetiger, Sep 14, 2012.

  1. We are Hull

    We are Hull Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    1,187
    Likes Received:
    159
    Think it was taken with a Nokia 5210
     
    #21
  2. Tuckin

    Tuckin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2011
    Messages:
    8,237
    Likes Received:
    2,794
    Fixed that for you.
     
    #22
  3. BigotAlertAnalRimMan

    BigotAlertAnalRimMan New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    3,330
    Likes Received:
    14
    why should he be arrested? it's every day there are private pictures like these taken, in hundreds of magazines... and no one gets arrested... why should it be different because of royalty?
     
    #23
  4. WhittlingStick

    WhittlingStick Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,781
    Likes Received:
    502
    Royalty are treated differently as nobody is interested in some random lass going topless and worrying about someone splashing it over the papers , its because its royalty its news ... apparently .
    He should be arrested , if you was to climb onto ur neighbours fence and start photographing the neighbour taking a shower you would be arrested , and that would be before the damage is done and the pic are published .
     
    #24
  5. Gawge

    Gawge Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    1,286
    Likes Received:
    34
    It shouldn't be different for royalty.

    If you are basically stalking someone, attempting to take pictures of them without their consent whilst they are on private property - you should be arrested.
     
    #25
  6. Jules Winfield

    Jules Winfield New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2012
    Messages:
    370
    Likes Received:
    9
    under french law it is illegal apparently and the royal family are pressing charges.

    personally I think her tits look like 2 half fried eggs.
     
    #26

  7. merchantman5

    merchantman5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    2,122
    Likes Received:
    205
     
    #27
  8. prideofyorkshire

    prideofyorkshire Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    734
    Likes Received:
    0
    Completely agree! People should keep their noses out!
     
    #28
  9. Dr.Stanley O'Google, HCFC

    Dr.Stanley O'Google, HCFC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2012
    Messages:
    17,041
    Likes Received:
    3,374
    Personally, I don't give a bastard......

    (Know what I mean, 'arry?)
     
    #29
  10. Mike Burgess

    Mike Burgess Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    682
    Likes Received:
    1
    They are nothing to shout home about. Still whoever took them is a complete ****. Complete invasion of privacy.
     
    #30
  11. BigotAlertAnalRimMan

    BigotAlertAnalRimMan New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    3,330
    Likes Received:
    14

    well that's your opinion but the point is no photographer does these days... so i don't see it happening this time round.

    She's entitled to do whatever she wants but she knows the risks... she's an idiot for not caring about them.
    I don't get why people are so protective of her or the family itself. what the **** do they do for you to deserve it?
     
    #31

Share This Page