Team for Next Season

I would suggest that it is YOUR argument that is poor - in last 2 seasons only played a handful of games - Forster has played 80+ games in that time.
As for playing in OUR team - Krul is very very poor at communicating with OUR team so saying that is worthless

 

In serious TERMS.. this would be my DREAM team for next season(going to be as realistic as possible) :

Harper
Simpson Samba/NEW CB* Colo Enrique
Barton Tiote
NEW RM/Guti Vargas* Ben Arfa*
Ba/NEW ST*

*Hangeland, Roger Johnson/Dann/Cahill/Shawcross/etc.?
*Gervinho???
*Him and Vargas rotate if needed/depending on effectiveness.
NEW ST*.. depends what style of football Pardew opts to play for. Personally I'll want to see fast, attacking, efficient/effective and a passing style of football, so we wouldn't neccesarly need a target man(Ba/Ameobi/etc..).. so Gamiero would probably be my pick or a fast(quick/pacey), nippy, agile and a clinical finisher sort of player(kind of like Jermaine Defoe or Hugo Rodagella but with more quality). Berbatov would be unreal though.. .

 

so you'd sell Enrique and buy 2 players? seriously? 35mil+whatever enrique's worth and that's it?

 

I'd be really ****ing disapointed with that team...... Seriously Llorente the only new face

 

Gervinho is a must buyin my opinion....

 

Is he **** poor at communicating with our team. He calls for balls much better than Harper and collects the ball and helps out the defense much better than Harper does. He has better instincts.

 

Yes he is poor at communicating, two or three times he didnt know whether to come for a long ball or leave it to the defence, and they just chased them all because he wasnt telling them what to do. Lucky Coloccini & Williamson made it easy for him.

 

Never said he was **** poor I said he was very very poor at communicating! If you bother to track the progress of Forster it is clear to see that he has been working on his weaknesses. Krul's main strength is his instincts but Forster is the better all rounded keeper

 

I said "is he **** poor at communicating", meaning he isn't. You obviously misunderstood what i said.

I have bothered to track the progress of Forster, or else i wouldn't have an opinion of him. I've watched him plenty of times playing for Celtic. He's good but i prefer Krul.

Krul is much better at commanding his box than Harper and is alot sharper coming off his line. Harper is currently a better shot stopper but Krul is getting better. He's made some epic saves for us this season and has played a part earning us some vital points.

 

Forster is a lot more commanding, has more prescence, is just as good at shot stopping as Krul. Forster's main weakness is his kicking and this has vastly improved in his time at Celtic. Yes Krul is getting better, but Forster is already better and improving at a faster rate than Krul mainly due to playing week in week out - it seems to me that at the moment Krul gets one off games and he puts in a blinder and I think this is due to the excitement of playing, whereas when he had a small run in the team after the first couple of games his game dropped off significantly.

 

Lets just agree to disagree mate, it's a pointless arguement now. Krul has played well in the PL, Forster deserves a chance. That's all we can say.

 

Thats if he gets sold, which looks likely now althougth i hope im wrong! Also that is a team without spending much, we need more squad players such as Ireland etc so we dont have more situations like villa where we loose two players and look like relegation fodder!

 

Harper

Simpson Samba Coloccini Enrique

Barton Tiote

Gervinho Ben Arfa Gutierrez

Gameiro

 

Interesting fact about Fernando Llorente... His name is Fernando Torres

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fernando_Llorente

Okay so it wasn't interesting...

 

last time i saw forster play it looked like he was made out of wood, he didnt move then he got sent off krul is better would agree forster needs a chance tho he could play the role krul has played this year harper is past it.

 

he's 26 idiot