Chelsea to get energy boost after Stamford Bridge club signs three-year deal with Russian firm Gazprom http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/chelsea/9407131/Chelsea-to-get-energy-boost-after-Stamford-Bridge-club-signs-three-year-deal-with-Russian-firm-Gazprom.html Looks like we are getting loads of new sponsors lately. In the last year Audi, Sauber F1 and Deltar Air Lines have all became partners of Chelsea FC!
http://www.sportspromedia.com/news/...Feeds&utm_campaign=Latest News&utm_medium=rss Did we hire someone new or are we just stepping up our game? Audi Sauber Delta Gazprom AP & PA
So basically Chelsea buy every player there is (you are liking your attacking midfielders lately) and bankroll it all by getting another sponsor in. FFP? What a waste of time.
So, have we done something wrong? It was my belief all clubs went out looking for sponsorship and advertising deals. What exactly is wrong with trying to maximise our revenue streams?
Please find in my original post where I said Chelsea have done something wrong cos I can't find anything that suggests that What's wrong is this half-assed approach to FFP - if it's gonna be implemented I'm all for it but it has to be done properly - otherwise it's pointless.
So what constitutes 'properly' in your opinion then? Far as I can see us going out and finding sponsors is properly.
Of course it's pointless, clubs will always find a way around it. It was Platini's baby after all so it's bound to be a **** up!
