I suppose that's technically correct. He doesn't exist, and therefore he loves us all a non-existent amount. Good point.
Hawking says that time etc started with the beginning of the universe. Therefore anything that existed before the universe existed outside of time and isnt subjected to the rules that apply to us = God/Creator
You my friend are blind maybe someday you'll open your eyes. Like I say, God loves us all equally, every being in this world. Even ones such as you that deny Gods existance.
Hawking says that before the universe and outside of the universe there are, and have been, other universes. Time is a man-made concept and is infinite.
What about the millions who have been killed in the name of Christianity. Did he love them all equally?
"In my most extreme fluctuations I have never been an atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God.'' Charles Darwin - 1879
The almighty surely went a convoluted route in the billions of years it took for gravity to create stars, supernovae, all heavier elements, bacteria, fish, dinosaurs, monkeys, us - and absolutely no mention of any of these tools of creation in any book claiming to be god's word.
I know there are other universes/worlds as the Quran mentioned it 1400 years ago. As for time, Hawkins believes it started with THIS universe for us and as the universe is finite then so is time etc
says who? I suggest you read the quran, some of its in there apart from the monkey to man thing as that never happened
He loved every single one of them. The best analogy to understand is this; If you have ever had a child, imagine how you felt at the birth, the overwhelming love you felt. Your child grows up and becomes an argumentative pain in the arse but you still love them. They do and say things that hurt and go against your wishes, but you still love them. Every moment from conception to eternity the love never ends. That’s God for you
It's a bit heavy on the theocratics for me - point me to the bits with the supernova and the dinosaurs please.
Conclusive proof . You've just missed out the end of his quote. He went on to say "...an agnostic would be the most correct description of my state of mind." How convenient that you forgot to include that part.
