1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Papist blasts SFA's Rangers verdict

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by supermong, Apr 12, 2011.

Page 1 of 2
  1. supermong

    supermong Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    0
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/13053820.stm

    Im surprised that Diouf and Boogie got away with a fine. Mccoist I can understand.

    I can see another "legal technicality" at play with Diouf and Boogie....

    All that being said, for McBride to come out and say words like "dishonest" and "biased" is premature at best and slanderous at worst....
     
    #1
    supermong, Apr 12, 2011
  2. Mick

    Mick Probably won't answer PMs Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    Messages:
    11,328
    Likes Received:
    928
    Why use the term papist?

    Why must Rangers fans always bring religion and ethnicity into ****ing everything, can you not just stick to the football?
     
    #2
    Mick, Apr 12, 2011
  3. supermong

    supermong Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ahhh sorry it was a typo - will edit.
     
    #3
    supermong, Apr 12, 2011
  4. The Raging Oxter

    The Raging Oxter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    31,025
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    Good on him. The SFA will do **** all about it because they don't have a leg to stand on and McBride would rip them to pieces.

    The Rangers-minded blazers know their time is coming to and end so are just having one last GIRUY. **** 'em. They'll be gone soon.

    Papist? Don't be a **** all your life supermong.
     
    #4
    The Raging Oxter, Apr 12, 2011
  5. The Raging Oxter

    The Raging Oxter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    31,025
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    A typo? <laugh>

    What was it meant to say? Rapist?

    Get tae ****!
     
    #5
    The Raging Oxter, Apr 12, 2011
  6. supermong

    supermong Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    0
    ST - you guys are paranoid. There is no conspiracy against you. The SFA are just a bunch of incompetant ****s..

    Cant change the title.....I have to remain a **** im afraid.
     
    #6
    supermong, Apr 12, 2011

  7. Rocket

    Rocket Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,902
    Likes Received:
    487
    McBride's an arsehole. :1980_boogie_down:

    Mon The Masons :emoticon-0150-hands
     
    #7
    Rocket, Apr 12, 2011
  8. The Raging Oxter

    The Raging Oxter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    31,025
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    A bunch of incompetent ****s who try to hammer Neil Lennon while letting two Rangers players off, one who manhandles the ref and the other who causes an altercation and, despite being told to leave the field, runs to the Gers fans and throws his shirt into the crowd.

    Maybe it's just Neil Lennon they hate eh?

    I'm pretty sure I saw George Peat posting on Follow Follow :emoticon-0105-wink:
     
    #8
    The Raging Oxter, Apr 12, 2011
  9. Admiral Pure

    Admiral Pure Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,572
    Likes Received:
    90
    I can't say it actually bothers or surprises me but it's a total cop-out by the SFA.
     
    #9
    Admiral Pure, Apr 12, 2011
  10. supermong

    supermong Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    0
    Neil Lennon got let off with a technicality!!!! FFS - green tinted glasses or what.... As I mentioned Boogie and Diouf should have been punished more - but I wouldnt be surprised that Rangers have taken a leaf out of Celtics book and used a legal technicality to get them off. I can foresee something like "it wasnt in the refs report"....

    George Peat is Follow Follow
     
    #10
    supermong, Apr 12, 2011
  11. The Raging Oxter

    The Raging Oxter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    31,025
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    Lennon didn't get "let off on a technicality". Celtic's lawyer took the SFA to task because they didn't understand their own rules.

    And, by the way, it's hard to take seriously an objective view from someone who starts a thread by calling someone a papist.
     
    #11
    The Raging Oxter, Apr 12, 2011
  12. supermong

    supermong Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ok apologies about papist - like to WUM Im afraid...meant to call him a baptist. Sure you took the SFA to task on the wording of the ban - but that certiainly wasnt in the spirit of the ban from the SFA.
     
    #12
    supermong, Apr 12, 2011
  13. The Raging Oxter

    The Raging Oxter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    31,025
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    <laugh>

    Away you to **** man!

    Baptist my arse...
     
    #13
    The Raging Oxter, Apr 12, 2011
  14. Otto Flayshow

    Otto Flayshow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    14,150
    Likes Received:
    3,751
    How were they let off? Both players were banned and fined.
     
    #14
    Otto Flayshow, Apr 12, 2011
  15. The Raging Oxter

    The Raging Oxter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    31,025
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    You're a pedantic **** Squiggler!

    Okay, they were punished with measly fines. It should have been more.
     
    #15
    The Raging Oxter, Apr 12, 2011
  16. supermong

    supermong Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well they got bans aswell. Play fair Stereo....or dont play at all
     
    #16
    supermong, Apr 12, 2011
  17. Otto Flayshow

    Otto Flayshow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    14,150
    Likes Received:
    3,751
    They just can't help misrepresenting the facts to support their narrow world view.
     
    #17
    Otto Flayshow, Apr 12, 2011
  18. The Raging Oxter

    The Raging Oxter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    31,025
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    You both know fine that they should have been punished further for their actions. And just not pathetically measly fines which are a fraction of a week's wages.
     
    #18
    The Raging Oxter, Apr 12, 2011
  19. The Raging Oxter

    The Raging Oxter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    31,025
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    If you want to play fair don't be calling people Papists then trying to pretend if was a typo.
     
    #19
    The Raging Oxter, Apr 12, 2011
  20. supermong

    supermong Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    0
    Theres an arguement that the SFA have actually over stepped the mark by giving fines rather than longer bans.... The bans can only be relevant to the Scottish Cup. Imagine the SFA came out and gave them a 6 match ban for the Scottish Cup.... The Tic fans would still be arguing...

    I can accept that the punishment doesnt fit the crime - BUT what do you want to give them? Ban them for League games....? But the offence wasnt committed in the league game....

    Again the SFA is a ****ing disaster
     
    #20
    supermong, Apr 12, 2011
Page 1 of 2

Share This Page