Optimistic Chelsea fans are clinging to their supposed good recent run of form at Old Trafford to support their belief that the CL tie is not finished. Now I agree that the tie is still alive, but simply because Chelsea have enough quality to beat us 2-1 or 2-0 next Tuesday. Nothing to do with any perceived hoodoo over us at OT. Because their recent record (as in, that enjoyed by this particular Chelsea team) away to United is nothing special. In fact, over the last 5 full seasons - 2005/6 to 2009/10 - their record at the Theatre of Dreams is no better than Arsenal's or Man City's, and only marginally better than Liverpool's. Do these other teams have this reputation of a favourable record at Old Trafford? No, so why do Chelsea? See below: Utd vs Chelsea 3 Utd wins, 1 draw, 1 Chelsea win (8 Utd goals, 3 Chelsea goals) 05/06 1-0 (Fletcher) 06/07 1-1 (Saha - Carvalho) 07/08 2-0 (Tevez, Saha) 08/09 3-0 (Vidic, Rooney, Berbatov) 09/10 1-2 (Macheda - J.Cole, Drogba) Utd vs City 3 Utd wins, 1 draw, 1 City win (11 Utd goals, 7 City goals) 05/06 1-1 (Van Nistelrooy - Barton) 06/07 3-1 (Rooney, Saha, Ronaldo - Trabelsi) 07/08 1-2 (Carrick - Vassell, Benjani) 08/09 2-0 (Tevez 2) 09/10 4-3 (Rooney, Fletcher 2, Owen - Barry, Bellamy 2) Utd vs Arsenal 3 Utd wins, 1 draw, 1 Arsenal win (6 Utd goals, 3 Arsenal goals) 05/06 2-0 (Rooney, Park) 06/07 0-1 (Adebayor) 07/08 2-1 (Ronaldo, Hargreaves - Adebayor) 08/09 0-0 09/10 2-1 (Rooney, Diaby og - Arshavin) Utd vs Liverpool 4 Utd wins, 1 Liverpool win (9 Utd goals, 5 Liverpool goals) 05/06 1-0 (Ferdinand) 06/07 2-0 (Scholes, Ferdinand) 07/08 3-0 (Brown, Ronaldo, Nani) 08/09 1-4 (Ronaldo - Torres, Gerrard, Aurelio, Dossena) 09/10 2-1 (Rooney, Park - Torres) So where does this come from? Just desperation on behalf of the Chelsea following? It's strange how these suppositions grow from nowhere. But as United fans, we should be used to myths by now.
We beat you 3-1 at OT in the year we first won the premiership...04/05... It was your last home game of the season and Keanes face was a picture when doing the lap of honour at the end...he was disgusted In that ratio, 3 losses, two wins and a draw isn't so bad I think the overall league record in that time is more favourable as well, which is what I'd rely more on that at OT which will bever be easy...@ SB five wins and one draw in the same period. It's not unfeasible that we'll win given our recent history against Utd, but let's face it you have a massive advantage and we've never beaten you in the CL
I was only going back 5 years. You can't go back 6 years. Who goes back 6 years for Gods sake? If you go back 10 years, then it's still only 3 wins (compared to Arsenal's 2 and Liverpool's 4)
Since the premiership started Chelsea's record at Old Toilet is better than any other visiting team Winning 5 Losing 6 Drawing 8 That's an unbeaten 14 out of 22 games Amazing! Next Please
Why stop at the the beginning of the Premiership, why not go back to the end of WWII or even back to the creation of football, or how about games only playing in a non- leap year or in April. The only question that matters is 'Are Chelsea capable of beating Man U?' and the answer is 'Yes'. Good luck to both and hope its a good game
Why stop there? Lets go back to the big bang Far enough for you! Ps. Had one of your motor bikes, ****ing marvelous
Alright smartarse. I went for 5 years because that's a nice round figure and a lot of the players playing 5 years ago are still playing now. Admittedly, the 5 year period does work best for my own ends, but I assure you that had nothing to do with my choice
As impressive as the record is, it still says you're more likely to lose or draw than to win. And I'll be happy with a draw thanks!
