more paranoid ramblings from a bitter tic. seems it's ok for bigoted celtic fans to hold top football positions within the SFA but not non celtic supporters. don't see you complaining that the FIFA man who is dealing with the SFA on the rangers case is irish so by law he must be a celtic fan. wonder if he's the same irish guy who used to work for UEFA and arrange the CL draws so that celtic always got the easiest draws. see how easy it is to make up this stuff. (according to your rules, if I say it again it's automatically true)
A ridiculous argument? "Look at it from our point of view?" is a ridiculous argument?... Surprised by you. Rangers have dragged the Scottish game into the gutter? Three words, Neil Francis Lennon. How many bans and disciplinaries did he go through? Did rangers cause people to go on strike and and plunge the game into chaos? You're getting as bad as Harry with the stretching of the truth and mud slinging. As for debt, I think you'll find that there isn't much between our levels of debt, don't believe everything you read in the papers...
Ah the stranger to the truth is back in full swing... First of all, the "cheating" alleged is from the use of dual contracts which was from the the summer of 1998 onwards. Therefor NOT from the 80's and NOTHING to do with nine in a row (which must devastate you!) and the EBT's that are being investigated (and rangers WILL be found not guilty btw) are from 2001-2010 during which period rangers only won 4 titles so IF the are found guilty (which they won't) and IF the SFA strip them of titles then they still have 50 leagues therefor the wee stars stay peckerhead! And EBT's aren't cheating, just tax dodging which EVERYONE would do if they could. Those titles were won on the park. If they weren't using EBT's they'd have just accumulated a bit for debt. And that is FACT despite what you idiots try to say by means of justifying your team getting beat.
They're only investigating from 1998 as it's when the SPL started, was it not? Had the SPL started earlier, they would investigate to its inception. I don't think they can investigate prior to that - hey, it might not be proven in any case. Neil Lennon's bans bring the game into disrepute
Neil Francis Lennon plays to different rules to Alastair Murdoch Mccoist , two examples even from this season after Aluko hearing , he abused referees from this including a game not involving Rangers and the referees fe last season . Then after the sfa hearing asking to naming and shaming the sfa panel despite knowing the names all along.Yet he still remains unpunished for these outbursts.
4:20 PM - 5 Jun 12 via web · Details 13m Jane Lewis Jane Lewis ‏@JaneLewisSport Fifa confirm what BBC Scotland told you on Friday nite. On the #Rangers #SFA dispute -today they say ''there is no need for us to become... Collapse Jane Lewis ‏@JaneLewisSport Fifa cont ''...involved with it being back within the sporting system which is in accordance with our own statutes.'' Collapse looks like you have been given a second chance
What is there to believe? What I wrote there actually HAPPENED! A little refreshing reading facts eh?...
Chapper you really are an idiot , I will have to keep things simple for you, obviously your one brain cell dosn't take to the truth very well . I said I would keep it simple , Rangers are about to die .
And you are comparing his behaviour to that of Rangers FC and saying what he has been found guilty of is actually worse than Rangers recent actions? No? Tell me this, did Neil Francis Lennon endanger the prospects of every club and the Scottish national side by taking his grievances outside of football? I think everyone knows he did not. He may have had his lawyer shred the SFA's regulations and show how flawed they were, he did not go running to a court of law when it went pear shaped and he did not get "His" way. To an outsider (and that's what I am) Rangers actions are reprehensible, not only because they have ignored proper channels of appeal, but because by ignoring other means of resolving their complaints they have potentially taken much needed money out of the Scottish game. I am aware that money never really bothered Rangers in the past, but some clubs do have a strategic vision, and therefore plan ahead based upon income. Dundee utd, Hearts, Celtic, Motherwell and St Johnstone need every penny they can get and Rangers blatant attempts to circumvent the SFA rules may have harmed them all. Nothing Neil Francis Lennon ever did comes close to the breathtaking arrogance and "I'm all right Jack" attitude Rangers have shown in this case. The fact that some still see fit to defend Rangers' right to take this outside of football -and argue that they have been somehow vindicated - I find incredible. So do many others, and not all of them (or even the majority) are Celtic fans.
dev, I wouldn't get too bothered by the likes of chappers. He is like the archetypal Rangers fan that was too busy thinking every bit of criticism coming Rangers' way was a Timmy agenda and that things were fine at RFC. They didn't have the objective nouse to ask questions of their club/ board, so Murray, Whyte and everyone else could carry on truly ****ing their club over. It is for the likes of chappers that we need to be truly grateful, because they stood idly by and did **** all whilst their club was pillaged. God bless everyone of them
Well done, Chapper. Smashed these monobrowed buffoons allez uber der platz. Taking care of business as per...
Well done Chapper !!! The guy is a first class clown that has not got the better of anybody on this board .
