"With anger at Rangers in Scottish football at boiling point, the SFA has moved closer to booting the beleagured club out of the game." (The Daily Record) nothing new there then. daily record and celtic are always angry at rangers and they will do anything they can to make the league easier for celtic. they never cared about tainted titles in the past when celtic were winning with the help of dodgy refs, so why would they care if celtic were given a bye to the SPL title. at least our titles were won fairly on the park, whereas most celtic titles were won from the penalty spot.
Half my mates wont buy the Record 'cos it's the Daily rhebel, and the other half 'cos it's the Daily Ranger !
It's no worth wiping your arse on but it has been more hun-minded since most Celtic fans stopped buying it. They cater for their readership hence the simplistic style, single sentence paragraphs and short words (hun friendly).
That's hilarious, you do know that there isn't a mandatory IQ test required when people attempt to purchase Celtic shirts or season books?...
Maybe if the daily record hadn't be so pro Rangers your club wouldn't be in the mess it is in . The journalist should have asking Murray serious question how the club was getting run instead of sucking up to him !!
I'd say in last 30 years , 25 of them Rangers have had more penalties than us , even this season winning the league by 20 points they still got more not surprising with Aluko dives . Facts are a funny thing though last year we got 17 but looking back 25 it should have been , Rangers got 14 but 7 would have been nearer the mark .
Remember when most of us on here were sensible and we only had the odd mong, like BH or Girvan? (sorry I really tried to think of a Celtic supporting old-style-mong to balance up this argument, but I can't seem to remember any from way back then - but I am sure there were a few?) Now it's about 45% mong with the Superhoopers booing the Chappers and vice versa. Hard to have a good old fashioned intelligentsia hun vs taig argument without the likes of Medro bringing *****philic clergy into it.
Perhaps we should have some ethic cleansing... I argue but I only deal in facts, if only others did too?...
FFS, it's the internet you Jimmy Nesbitt lookalike, not the Oxford Union Society. Are you expecting Stephen Hawking to pop on for a quick chat about the creation of the universe? The best you could muster was John Higgins Stop trying to pretend that you're some intellectual heavyweight; you're just an odds compiler who lives on the Isle of Mong...which is pretty apt <higginsgate>
