1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Who Should Go to Euro 2012?

Discussion in 'Norwich City' started by Dangerous Marsupial, May 10, 2012.

  1. tipsycanary

    tipsycanary Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2012
    Messages:
    1,852
    Likes Received:
    30
    Arsenal fans have come across as a somewhat delusional bunch over the past week or so and you are just adding to it. I agree its not just about goals and Holt has much more to his game than that, but goals do help in winning matches. Its not great picking players who can't hit a barn door
     
    #21
  2. Arsenal4life

    Arsenal4life Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Messages:
    2,698
    Likes Received:
    25
    Thats true. Sturridge is awful so I wouldnt take him. i would probably take wellbeck. i dont rate him but at least he can hold himself in that company and COULD become international clas. Holt is just a journeyman so whats the point?
     
    #22
  3. Star of David Bardsley

    Star of David Bardsley 2023 Funniest Poster

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2011
    Messages:
    70,009
    Likes Received:
    57,521
    Again, I can't stand the fat **** but he offers a lot more than goals.
     
    #23
  4. Dazz19

    Dazz19 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,020
    Likes Received:
    2
    Holt's game isn't just about goals though. He makes chances for his strike partner, he pulls defenders out of position and creates space for other players, he chases down every ball which means defenders don't have time to think about clearances, they just have to get rid of it. He can be used as a lone striker, a target man for someone to play off or he can be the player running off the target man.
     
    #24
  5. Dangerous Marsupial

    Dangerous Marsupial Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,386
    Likes Received:
    54
    Ok, so your taking Welbeck. And I'm presuming your other three are therefore Carroll/Defoe/Crouch etc? So you're excuse to omit Holt is he isn't good enough for England. Well, he's better than all those players!
     
    #25
  6. Arsenal4life

    Arsenal4life Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Messages:
    2,698
    Likes Received:
    25
    Only when you play the long ball. He offers league 1 tactics and league 1 ability. He has made the most of what he has. But vs spain and germany and holland you cant afford to be carrying players of holt's ilk. He wouldnt hold onto possesion and the germans would just batter england time and time again.
     
    #26

  7. Arsenal4life

    Arsenal4life Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Messages:
    2,698
    Likes Received:
    25
    I wouldn't take defoe. The guy is absolutely shocking and worse than holt. I guess I would take carroll. I mean the lad is a complete donkey and he turns like the QE2 but he is the best of a horrid bunch.

    So I would take Wellbeck, Rooney, Carroll and Bent if he is back.

    Again that is woeful. England are woeful, just not bad enough to bring in Holt in my view.
     
    #27
  8. Star of David Bardsley

    Star of David Bardsley 2023 Funniest Poster

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2011
    Messages:
    70,009
    Likes Received:
    57,521
    Why not? We've carried Lampard, Gerrard and the rest when they've been out of their depth. At the very least Holt offers a physical battle which they may not be used to and he's proven an eye for goal, an ability to hold it up and bring others into play and an excellent work-rate. Norwich don't play long ball and don't play League One tactics, whatever that means as I doubt you've seen a League One game in your life. You're a football snob.
     
    #28
  9. Dangerous Marsupial

    Dangerous Marsupial Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,386
    Likes Received:
    54
    Ironically, that is one of things he does best! If you're going to try and criticise him, at least do it on actual grounds like his lack of pace etc!

    Anyway, I cba to argue about Holt with you I don't expect him to go to Euros but I think he is good enough. As I said earlier, it is if Ruddy is omitted that will grate with me more.
     
    #29
  10. canary_max

    canary_max Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Messages:
    5,659
    Likes Received:
    45
    Usual tripe in this article by so called experts

    Some of the comments are more balanced

    We've all debated holt enough times, but the season ruddy has had, he has got to go above green!!
     
    #30
  11. Arsenal4life

    Arsenal4life Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Messages:
    2,698
    Likes Received:
    25
    Lack of pace and lack of technical ability. That is why he cant play at this level. Also he is old. So at least carroll and people might improve and grow into international players (carroll wont though because he is awful).

    Edit: and the same can be said for ruddy. He just doesnt have the reflexes you expect from a top keeper.
     
    #31
  12. Dangerous Marsupial

    Dangerous Marsupial Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,386
    Likes Received:
    54
    Lack of technical ability... Everton goal? Wolves goal? I haven't seen many other strikers produce that quality this season! :) Have you even watched the guy play? Your arguments against him are ending of as evidence for the case!
     
    #32
  13. Dazz19

    Dazz19 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,020
    Likes Received:
    2
    Really? Have you actually watched any of our matches this season?
     
    #33
  14. Arsenal4life

    Arsenal4life Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Messages:
    2,698
    Likes Received:
    25
    So you think Grant Holt is good enough to compete with players like Ozil, Sneijder, RVP, Xavi, Iniesta, Benzema?

    Please, there is such a gulf between them I wouldnt even say they are playing the same game! Holt is championship or lower level prem. International level is meant to be the pinnacle. Please stop being so blinkered!
     
    #34
  15. Arsenal4life

    Arsenal4life Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Messages:
    2,698
    Likes Received:
    25
    Man city recently he leaked 6 where I thought he should of done better on several of them.
     
    #35
  16. tipsycanary

    tipsycanary Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2012
    Messages:
    1,852
    Likes Received:
    30
    Haha "lack of reflexes" yeah he's terrible, but still better than Arsenals keeper. Who would you take?
     
    #36
  17. Dangerous Marsupial

    Dangerous Marsupial Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,386
    Likes Received:
    54
    He's competed with any player he has played against in the PL, so yes I honestly do believe he could (Although it's the defender's job to worry about those guys) and as I have said about 10 times now, he is certainly less likely to embarrass himself than Andy Carroll is against these guys.
     
    #37
  18. Arsenal4life

    Arsenal4life Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Messages:
    2,698
    Likes Received:
    25
    Well your point is semi valid because you could make a case that Holt is currently better than the alternatives. But even if that is true it is a sad case for english football because Holt isnt very good. Germany and Holland will laugh if we show up with people like carroll or holt.
     
    #38
  19. Tony_Munky_Canary

    Tony_Munky_Canary Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2011
    Messages:
    5,949
    Likes Received:
    964
    I think we're wasting our time with this Gooner lads, he obviously has about the same level of knowledge of players outside the top six as the rest of the MotD panel. Clueless, absolutely clueless.

    To say Holt is 'just about the goals' shows a lack of footballing knowledge that is far too common on this forum. And if you think he's just a big lump of muscle who batters his way through games as you no doubt do then you are deluded as well. His all round game is superb, he can score goals with both feet and head, his reading of the game is sublime, as are the runs he makes dragging defenders all over the place. He's got a good touch, holds the ball up as well as anyone, is a lot quicker than given credit for and has an engine like a tank - and is an absolute nightmare to defend against, ask your boys, John Terry, Agger etc etc. He even gave Kompany more than a few problems against Man C and hasn't looked out of place all season. Bags of assists as well, what more do you want?

    But if we are talking about the goals - which I guess is what strikers are ultimately judged upon - how many other strikers (let alone English ones) have scored against Man U, Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool, Newcastle and Everton (home and away) this season? And have you seen the goals he's scored against these so called international defenders? Not one of them scrappy and several of them have been pure quality.

    Get your head out of your arse and realise there are better players around than those sitting on the bench for the so called elite, fans like you do my head in <ok>
     
    #39
  20. Dangerous Marsupial

    Dangerous Marsupial Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,386
    Likes Received:
    54
    I actually agree with you. I think it is a little sad that I think a guy the wrong side of thirty is England's possibly second best striker (You might agree with second best) and that he would probably do better and certainly show more passion than any of the overhyped young players like Carroll/Welbeck/Sturridge.
     
    #40

Share This Page