pick and choose as usual. address the points re the banning on the spurs board why cant a muslim follow an 'english' team? chelsea are more jewish than you spuds re the israel/palestine issue are you fook neutral, although it does depend on who you log on as with regards to how biases and abusive your posts are
shame i have to go PNP, just had a text some friends are on their way on the plus side you can cane google and wikki you are pathetic, in all your guises
Well you werent exactly bursting to raise any objections to the last two Israel threads/propaganda articles that THFC posted recently that were full of the sort of lies and half-truths that Goebbels would have been proud of.
When did I say that a Muslim couldn't follow an English team? I said that you personally following Man Utd is hypocritical, not Muslims in general. Could you try that again, as I have no idea what it's supposed to mean. I've repeatedly made the same points about the Israel/Palestine issue and I don't know what you mean by the bold bit.
I barely contributed to one, merely pointing out that he attracted the expected response and I think I missed the other. My position has been entirely consistent.
It's not hypocritical to support a football team though, unless for example you tell others to support their local team but dont yourself, politics shouldn't come in to it
Nonsense, politics is in everything. A bunch of Muslim terrorists burning the USA flag then going to McDonalds are hypocrites. Hating the west while wearing a Man Utd top (a club which epitomises western capitalism) is hypocrisy.
It's Football though, it seems as if you two feel we should support clubs based on our political/religous beliefs
You can support whoever you like, but if they're the complete antithesis of everything that you stand for, then you're a hypocrite.
I suppose you have had this discussion with KingHotSpur. Him being a spurs supporting muslim and all that
I don't see the problem with that. Spurs have embraced an abused section of our support and use a term of that abuse to show our solidarity with all fellow Spurs fans. Unless King hates Jews, which I've seen no suggestion of and have no reason to think that he does, then I don't see how you think that's a valid comparison. If you were to start supporting Maccabi Haifa, on the other hand...
you know exactly what that means anyway as I said I am about to get busy so what I want you to do, as you are so fond of wikki and google is to look at the history of ownership and anme of Man Utd then look at the same for spurs then tell me what is more ironic/hypocritical a muslim supporting UTD or an atheist supporting spurs
No, I don't feel that at all. But when you have a man, living in Britain, who clearly has a problem with western ideals but seems to embrace those very ideals (didn't he claim to own a number of houses, cars etc?) and supports a football club that is the epitome of western capitalism it's a bit hypocritical wouldn't you agree? No matter how hard you try, you cannot separate football (or indeed just about anything) from politics. Just look at Rangers at the moment.
I already told you, there's no conflict with a Muslim supporting Man Utd, just a rabid anti-Western lunatic, like yourself. There's also no conflict with an atheist supporting Tottenham. An animal rights activist, possibly, but not an atheist. I have no idea what you meant in that other bit, either. It's gibberish. Why would I say otherwise if I understood it?
The most pertinent question is why fan is still on here nearly an hour after claiming he had to go as he had friends coming round?
Celtic, they're my dad's team And I know what you're implying that's why i made a point to say 'for the most part' throughout my posts, in Rangers and Celtic's cases it is different, although I don't agree with that, so my point still stands
